Exactly. :P Now if you all don't mind, I'm gonna listen to the Sun Bowl. My Ducks will likely loose, but I'm gonna listen anyway. I'm stubborn like that.
-----Original Message----- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 10:56 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: SonicWall NAT'ing question Works out to be the same.... On Dec 31, 2007 12:52 PM, NTSysAdmin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I gave you the wrong site.sorry. > > > > Should have been http://secunia.com/ > > > > S > > > > > > From: Jim Majorowicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 2:29 PM > > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: SonicWall NAT'ing question > > > > > > > Steve, > > > > I'm not going to get in a pissing match with you especially when you point > me to a website that is trying to sell me something, but my guess is that > any vulnerabilities listed would be for retired product lines. (At least a > quick check of *CURRENT* Watchguard products seems to indicates 0 > vunribilities, so I'm gonna have to take your word for the rest of it.) If > you're gonna qualify a statement like that, you'd better make sure you > qualify it for both sides. I'd hazard a guess that *EVERY* product designed > as a firewall has at least one vulnerability discovered for it, and that > *INCLUDES* ISA. (Don't make me whip out past ISA vulnerabilities and the > disasters that surrounded them.) How a company handles those discoveries is > far more important. > > > > My point to Dr. Shinder was that his response was in no way helpful in > answering the question asked. Just *ANOTHER* of his flame inducing posts > that start the same old flame wars that we've all done 100's times in the > last 10 years. (My Gawd people, we *HAVE* been answering questions on this > list for 10 *YEARS* We're getting old.) And it seems that you and I are > taking that bait. > > > > > > From: Steve Moffat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NTSysAdmin > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 9:50 AM > > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: SonicWall NAT'ing question > > > > > > > Hmm. > > > > Check secunia.org for vulnerabilities on all the products you've > mentioned..then check on compromises on the same products. > > > > Not 1 report of a compromised ISA protected environment since ISA 2000. > Can't say that about the rest... > > > > S > > > > > > From: Jim Majorowicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 1:15 PM > > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: SonicWall NAT'ing question > > > > > > > Dr. Shinder, > > > > Despite what you seem to want to believe there are other equally good (Even > better, IMHO) firewalls out there that come in appliances. That's not to > say that ISA isn't a good product, as it has it's uses, but so do SonicWall, > Watchguard and Checkpoint products. If you can't add to a discussion in a > way that helps the poster resolve their problem, I would suggest you refrain > from posting, if only to keep guys like Mr. Ely and Mr. Shook from grabbing > pitchforks and torches and stirring up the locals into a mob looking to put > your neck in a noose.. Again. > > > > > > > > From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 1:25 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: SonicWall NAT'ing question > > > > > > ASA? > > ACK! Why didn't you use an ISA firewall? Much more secure and many fewer > security issues. > > > > Only a fool would use an ASA, IMHO. > > > > HTH, > > Tom > > > > > > From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 2:27 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: SonicWall NAT'ing question > > > > > > SonicWall Pro 1260 w/enhanced OS > > > > I need to configure this box to NAT/PAT for a new network (10.101.2.x/24) I > just brought online. This sonicwall is only going to be in service for a > few more weeks, as I'm migrating to a new ASA 5510. I did figure out the > routing on the sonicwall so it can get to the aforementioned network but > nodes on that network can't get to the Internet. Do I create a new NAT > policy? What am I missing? > > > > > Shook > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/andyshook ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
