Is “having at least one DC a physical box” still a reasonable best practice in 
2012?
David Lum
Systems Engineer // NWEATM
Office 503.548.5229 // Cell (voice/text) 503.267.9764
From: Walker, Michael [mailto:mwal...@mail.cvhp.org]
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 12:02 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Hyper-V Design Questions


Thank you Art for your input!  The answers to your questions are below.

Michael Walker
Senior Network Engineer
Citrus Valley Health Partners
140 W. College Street, Covina, CA  91723
Phone/Fax/Pager: (888) 299-6882
mwal...@mail.cvhp.org<mailto:mwal...@mail.cvhp.org>

From: Art DeKneef 
[mailto:art.dekn...@cox.net]<mailto:[mailto:art.dekn...@cox.net]>
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 1:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: [SPAM] RE: Hyper-V Design Questions

Just some general questions and observations.


1.       The Hyper-V host server can legally only run the Hyper-V role. So no 
you can’t move AD and File & Print Services to the host.
                Ok.

2.       Are the virtual servers all new servers or replacing existing servers?
                All are new.

3.       Do you have other AD servers in the network? Generally it is best to 
have a physical server running AD with additional virtual AD server being OK.
                There is one existing 2008 R2 64-Bit Server running AD, File & 
Print and Remote Desktop Services.  Two of the new VMs would add redundancy.

4.       How many NICs are you planning for the server?
                I have 6 NICs - My plan was to use 1 for the host and just 1 
for all the VMs or would it be better to give each VM it's own NIC?

5.       If these are existing servers, what kind of utilization do they have 
currently?
                Utilization is light.  There are only 8 users currently, will 
grow to 15 with the new server and SQL App.  Most all will be connecting via 
RDP.

6.       Your first RAID 1 configuration (300GB) doesn’t make sense. You show 
300 for system, 60 for host OS and 240 for 3 VMs. (3 x 80) That adds to 600 by 
my math. So to answer your second question, No I don’t agree with your storage 
configuration. ☺ Or are you just saying that this is the system partition and 
it will be used as 60 and 240.
                I meant 300 total for the RAID Set to be divied up between the 
OS (60) and the VMs (240).  The problem though is 240 GB is not sufficient for 
all the VMs.  I am thinking of changing the storage config to two RAID 5 Arrays 
- 3x300 + 6x300 + 1 Global Hot Spare.  The first RAID Array would be for the OS 
& VMs.  The second array would be for the File Data & SQL Data.  I spoke with 
the software vendor who will be supporting the SQL Database  and they wanted 
the SQL log files to be located on the same partition as the SQL Data…  They 
said for this small site, performance wasn't an issue and they were concerned 
about recoverability.

7.       Is the SQL data partition configured for growth? Meaning what is the 
initial use of that 1.2 TB and how long before it gets full.
                The SQL Data Partition is configured for growth.  I do not know 
the actual size but I am guessing 1.2 TB should last at least 3-5 years.  I 
have 6 open drive bays for expansion if necessary.

I’m sure others will have other questions.

Art

From: Walker, Michael 
[mailto:mwal...@mail.cvhp.org]<mailto:[mailto:mwal...@mail.cvhp.org]>
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 12:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Hyper-V Design Questions

Hi All,

I have very limited experience with Hyper-V and am about to do my first 
install.  Below is a descirption of my requirements and a proposed 
configuration.  My two questions are at the very bottom of the email in Red.

Any feedback or assistance is greatly appreciated!!!

Michael Walker
Senior Network Engineer
Citrus Valley Health Partners
140 W. College Street, Covina, CA  91723
Phone/Fax/Pager: (888) 299-6882
mwal...@mail.cvhp.org<mailto:mwal...@mail.cvhp.org>

Hardware & Software:
Dell PowerEdge T710
Dual Intel XEON X5650, 2.66Ghz, 12M Cache, Turbo HT (6 Cores per proc)
48GB RAM (12x4GB), 1333MHz Dual Ranked LV RDIMMs
PERC H700 RAID Controller, 1 GB NV Cache
(10) 300 GB 10K RPM SAS Drives 6GBps
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise
Microsoft SQL 2008 Standard
Acronis Backup & Recovery Virtual Edition

Physical & Virtual Servers:
Physical Host
Minimum Requirements:  1 CPU, 4 GB RAM
Virtual Machine 1 – AD, File & Print Server
Minimum Requirements:  1 CPU, 4 GB RAM, 60 GB HD Space
Virtual Machine 2 - SQL Server - MS SQL 2008 R2 Standard
Minimum Requirements:  2 CPU, 24 GB RAM, 1200 GB HD Space
Virtual Machine 3 - App Server - MS Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise
Minimum Requirements:  1 CPU, 4 GB RAM, 80 GB HD Space
Virtual Machine 4 - Remote Desktop Server - MS Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise
Minimum Requirements:  1 CPU, 8 GB RAM, 80 GB HD Space

Usage:
There will be 15 users using RDP to access their EMR Application called MD 
Office.  Each TS Session requires between 50 & 200 MB.  Of the 15 Users there 
may be 5 using MS Office.

Storage Configuration:
10 x 300GB Drives
                2 x 300GB (RAID1) - 1 300 GB Virtual Drive
                                System Partition – 300 GB
                                                Host OS – 60 GB
                                                3 VMs – 240 GB
                2 x 300GB (RAID1) - 1 300 GB Virtual Drive
                                VM 1 Partition - 60 GB
                                File & Data Partitioin - 200 GB
                                SQL Logs Partition – 40 GB
                5 x 300GB (RAID5) - 1 1200 GB Virtual Drive
                                SQL Data Partition – 1200 GB
                1 x 300GB (Hot Spare)

QUESTIONS:
With the above minimum requirements in mind -
1.       Would you keep VM1 for AD, File & Print or would you eliminate it and 
run AD, File and Print on the Physical Host allowing me to use my 4th license 
for an additional Remote Desktop Server.
2.       Do you agree with the Storage Configuration Design or would you change 
it?


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to