3. Good news on the existing physical DC. Helps for when you need to reboot the 
new server with the 4 VMs. Redundancy is a good thing.

 

4. Since you have 6 NICs available and are not planning to cluster anything now 
I think I would use 1 NIC for the management of the host and 2 NICs for the 4 
VMs. You could put VM1 and VM2 on one and VM3 and VM4 on the other. Or 1 NIC 
for VM1 and the other NIC gets VM 2,3 and 4. The theory there being they hit 
the RDS server and access the EMR application and SQL. Since you say traffic is 
light you could go a couple of different ways and adjust after viewing your 
performance metrics.

 

6. Generally speaking, however a server was to be configured on a physical box 
applies to a virtual one. So I think having the SQL logs and data on separate 
partitions is better. If the vendor supporting the database feels the traffic 
is light and the performance impact is low that having the logs and data on the 
same partition won’t be an issue, I would go with their recommendation. Again 
it can be changed if their initial assessment turns out to be inaccurate. Only 
time and usage will tell. 15 light users can turn into 15 heavy users and 
performance could suffer. I’m curious about their concerns on recoverability. 
It’s not like you don’t have redundancy and backup built into your plan.

 

I would leave your storage as you have it. Two RAID 1 partitions and one RAID5. 
First RAID 1- host OS and two VMs. Second RAID1- File & data and two VMs. SQL 
data and logs on the RAID5.

 

Art

 

From: Walker, Michael [mailto:mwal...@mail.cvhp.org] 
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 1:02 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Hyper-V Design Questions

 

 

Thank you Art for your input!  The answers to your questions are below. 

 

Michael Walker

Senior Network Engineer

Citrus Valley Health Partners

140 W. College Street, Covina, CA  91723

Phone/Fax/Pager: (888) 299-6882

 <mailto:mwal...@mail.cvhp.org> mwal...@mail.cvhp.org

 

From: Art DeKneef [mailto:art.dekn...@cox.net] 
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 1:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: [SPAM] RE: Hyper-V Design Questions

 

Just some general questions and observations.

 

1.       The Hyper-V host server can legally only run the Hyper-V role. So no 
you can’t move AD and File & Print Services to the host.

                Ok.

2.       Are the virtual servers all new servers or replacing existing servers?

                All are new.

3.       Do you have other AD servers in the network? Generally it is best to 
have a physical server running AD with additional virtual AD server being OK.

                There is one existing 2008 R2 64-Bit Server running AD, File & 
Print and Remote Desktop Services.  Two of the new VMs would add redundancy.

4.       How many NICs are you planning for the server? 

                I have 6 NICs - My plan was to use 1 for the host and just 1 
for all the VMs or would it be better to give each VM it's own NIC?

5.       If these are existing servers, what kind of utilization do they have 
currently?

                Utilization is light.  There are only 8 users currently, will 
grow to 15 with the new server and SQL App.  Most all will be connecting via 
RDP.

6.       Your first RAID 1 configuration (300GB) doesn’t make sense. You show 
300 for system, 60 for host OS and 240 for 3 VMs. (3 x 80) That adds to 600 by 
my math. So to answer your second question, No I don’t agree with your storage 
configuration. J Or are you just saying that this is the system partition and 
it will be used as 60 and 240.

                I meant 300 total for the RAID Set to be divied up between the 
OS (60) and the VMs (240).  The problem though is 240 GB is not sufficient for 
all the VMs.  I am thinking of changing the storage config to two RAID 5 Arrays 
- 3x300 + 6x300 + 1 Global Hot Spare.  The first RAID Array would be for the OS 
& VMs.  The second array would be for the File Data & SQL Data.  I spoke with 
the software vendor who will be supporting the SQL Database  and they wanted 
the SQL log files to be located on the same partition as the SQL Data…  They 
said for this small site, performance wasn't an issue and they were concerned 
about recoverability.

7.       Is the SQL data partition configured for growth? Meaning what is the 
initial use of that 1.2 TB and how long before it gets full.

                The SQL Data Partition is configured for growth.  I do not know 
the actual size but I am guessing 1.2 TB should last at least 3-5 years.  I 
have 6 open drive bays for expansion if necessary.

 

I’m sure others will have other questions.

 

Art

 

From: Walker, Michael [mailto:mwal...@mail.cvhp.org] 
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 12:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Hyper-V Design Questions

 

Hi All, 

 

I have very limited experience with Hyper-V and am about to do my first 
install.  Below is a descirption of my requirements and a proposed 
configuration.  My two questions are at the very bottom of the email in Red.

 

Any feedback or assistance is greatly appreciated!!!

 

Michael Walker

Senior Network Engineer

Citrus Valley Health Partners

140 W. College Street, Covina, CA  91723

Phone/Fax/Pager: (888) 299-6882

 <mailto:mwal...@mail.cvhp.org> mwal...@mail.cvhp.org

 

Hardware & Software:  

Dell PowerEdge T710

Dual Intel XEON X5650, 2.66Ghz, 12M Cache, Turbo HT (6 Cores per proc)

48GB RAM (12x4GB), 1333MHz Dual Ranked LV RDIMMs

PERC H700 RAID Controller, 1 GB NV Cache

(10) 300 GB 10K RPM SAS Drives 6GBps 

Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise

Microsoft SQL 2008 Standard

Acronis Backup & Recovery Virtual Edition

 

Physical & Virtual Servers:

Physical Host

Minimum Requirements:  1 CPU, 4 GB RAM

Virtual Machine 1 – AD, File & Print Server 

Minimum Requirements:  1 CPU, 4 GB RAM, 60 GB HD Space

Virtual Machine 2 - SQL Server - MS SQL 2008 R2 Standard

Minimum Requirements:  2 CPU, 24 GB RAM, 1200 GB HD Space 

Virtual Machine 3 - App Server - MS Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise

Minimum Requirements:  1 CPU, 4 GB RAM, 80 GB HD Space

Virtual Machine 4 - Remote Desktop Server - MS Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise

Minimum Requirements:  1 CPU, 8 GB RAM, 80 GB HD Space

 

Usage:  

There will be 15 users using RDP to access their EMR Application called MD 
Office.  Each TS Session requires between 50 & 200 MB.  Of the 15 Users there 
may be 5 using MS Office.

 

Storage Configuration:  

10 x 300GB Drives

                2 x 300GB (RAID1) - 1 300 GB Virtual Drive

                                System Partition – 300 GB

                                                Host OS – 60 GB

                                                3 VMs – 240 GB                 

                2 x 300GB (RAID1) - 1 300 GB Virtual Drive

                                VM 1 Partition - 60 GB

                                File & Data Partitioin - 200 GB 

                                SQL Logs Partition – 40 GB

                5 x 300GB (RAID5) - 1 1200 GB Virtual Drive

                                SQL Data Partition – 1200 GB

                1 x 300GB (Hot Spare)

 

QUESTIONS:   

With the above minimum requirements in mind - 

1.       Would you keep VM1 for AD, File & Print or would you eliminate it and 
run AD, File and Print on the Physical Host allowing me to use my 4th license 
for an additional Remote Desktop Server.

2.       Do you agree with the Storage Configuration Design or would you change 
it?

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to