Well now you can have mine weather you want them or not:

 

- Vastly improved GUI (bye bye ProgMan & FileMan)

- Plug-N-Play

- Power Management (you can finally use this thing on a laptop)

- AD

- MMC

- EFS

- Dynamic Disks

- Fat32 support

- USB support

- UDF support (DVDs!)

- WFP

- WMI

- WDM introduced (Finally Win2K device driver development became an
equal citizen for developers)

- Quotas

-Legit DirectX

- WSH

- Group Policy

-Offline Files

-RDP/Terminal services in base edition

-DFS

 

 

While each new version of Windows has a laundry-list of new features,
and there are a bunch of other ones in Win2K I didn't list (MSMQ,
etc...),  that subset I just listed are ones that made a significant
tangible difference in the experience to me.... Major improvements.

 

And the thing was pretty darn fast and stable. Heck I ran betas 1-3 for
a year or better before release and they were pretty rock solid.

 

I'd argue Win2K may have been the single most significant release since
NT was born.

 

-sc

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From: Rankin, James R [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 10:46 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?

 

I thought 2K was sh!t. I've had everyone else's thoughts on this already
though. But I still hate it. :-)

---Blackberried

________________________________

From: "Steven M. Caesare" <scaes...@caesare.com> 

Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 10:40:08 -0500

To: NT System Admin Issues<ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>

ReplyTo: "NT System Admin Issues"
<ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>

Subject: RE: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?

 

> 2000 not so good

 

Wait, what?

 

-sc

 

From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 3:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?

 

Maybe everyone's just pensive because Microsoft have a habit of
following good OSes with bad. NT4 good - 2000 not so good - XP/2003 good
- Vista/Server 2008 pants - 7/Server 2008 R2 good - 8 ?

On 5 March 2012 20:00, John Hornbuckle
<john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us> wrote:

As an enterprise, I'm very concerned about the learning curve, too.

 

But at some point, you have to finally break away from the past even if
it involves a steep learning curve. The jump from DOS to Win3x required
quite a bit of retraining, as did the jump from Win3x to Win95. Both of
those were fairly radical moves, and things have stayed relatively
static since Win95 with the old familiar Start button in the lower-left
corner.

 

Maybe it's time for a big shift.

 

 

John

 

 

 

 

 

From: Dan Bartley [mailto:bartl...@corp.netcarrier.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 2:46 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?

 

I have to say my initial reaction is good for tabs. Like John, I can't
wait to see some of the new tablets. 

 

As for Enterprise, I don't see Win8 making its mark if it stays the
current course. In fact I have a feeling it will go the way of Vista in
the Enterprise. It is too limiting and non-intuitive. It requires a
complete retraining for users and very few IT people have the time for
that. The CP also lacks some key domain support at the moment, such as
in the printer and file sharing areas, so maybe next version I will
change my mind. Then again, they really ditched the enterprise in
Windows Phone in my opinion, so maybe they won't improve on that.

 

Best Regards,

Dan Bartley

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin




-- 
"On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put
into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am
not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could
provoke such a question."

***** IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER *****

This document should be read only by those persons to whom it is
addressed. If you have received this message it was obviously addressed
to you and therefore you can read it, even it we didn't mean to send it
to you. However, if the contents of this email make no sense whatsoever
then you probably were not the intended recipient, or, alternatively,
you are a mindless cretin; either way, you should immediately kill
yourself and destroy your computer (not necessarily in that order). Once
you have taken this action, please contact us.. no, sorry, you can't use
your computer, because you just destroyed it, and possibly also
committed suicide afterwards, but I am starting to digress...... 

The originator of this email is not liable for the transmission of the
information contained in this communication. Or are they? Either way
it's a pretty dull legal query and frankly one I'm not going to dwell
on. But should you have nothing better to do, please feel free to
ruminate on it, and please pass on any concrete conclusions should you
find them. However, if you pass them on via email, be sure to include a
disclaimer regarding liability for transmission.

In the event that the originator did not send this email to you, then
please return it to us and attach a scanned-in picture of your mother's
brother's wife wearing nothing but a kangaroo suit, and we will
immediately refund you exactly half of what you paid for the can of
Whiskas you bought when you went to Pets At Home yesterday. 

We take no responsibility for non-receipt of this email because we are
running Exchange 5.5 and everyone knows how glitchy that can be. In the
event that you do get this message then please note that we take no
responsibility for that either. Nor will we accept any liability, tacit
or implied, for any damage you may or may not incur as a result of
receiving, or not, as the case may be, from time to time,
notwithstanding all liabilities implied or otherwise, ummm, hell, where
was I...umm, no matter what happens, it is NOT, and NEVER WILL BE, OUR
FAULT! 

The comments and opinions expressed herein are my own and NOT those of
my employer, who, if he knew I was sending emails and surfing the
seamier side of the Internet, would cut off my manhood and feed it to me
for afternoon tea. 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to