What's the business justification for IPv6? Seems like you're just wasting money if you have no reason to deploy. For internal networks using private IPv4 addressing today, I'm not sure that there's a compelling case that can be made for deploying IPv6 for most organisations.
You can still have IPv6 DHCP if you want - not sure I understand your position on that - unless you have something in your deployment plan to not have DHCPv6 for your network. Cheers Ken From: m b [mailto:midphan12...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 13 December 2012 8:47 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: IPv6 deployments We are a Windows shop, currently 2K8 R2 native. We've got a block of IPv6 addresses, and a perfectly-functioning IPv4 global WAN across three dozen city centers, and in the face of "If it works, don't fix it", we're planning to deploy IPv6 in 2013. Those of you who have done a deployment, did you go stateful or stateless? Walking away from a world that includes DHCP servers feels foreign to me, so I'm interested to hear the experience of people I trust. We stay fairly current with technology, don't anticipate difficulty with router/switch/device capability. I hope to deploy v6 in addition to the in-place v4, and without using any transition technologies (ISATAP). Am I a dreamer? Were their any "gotcha" challenges that you ran into? ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
