Always welcome.




*ASB
**http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* <http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker>*
**Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations & Information Security) for
the SMB market…***





On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Richard McClary
<richard.mccl...@aspca.org>wrote:

> Thank you!****
>
> ** **
>
> --****
>
> richard****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 26, 2013 5:46 PM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Semi OT: Cisco versus Checkpoint & Juniper****
>
> ** **
>
> The SRX line is Juniper's enterprise line.  The SSG is based on their
> Netscreen acquisition many moons ago.****
>
> ** **
>
> The cost difference between those two platforms is not insignificant.   My
> personal experience is with the SSG family, and it will be the one that I
> would expect to be more applicable to the original post.****
>
> ** **
>
> For the money of the SRX platform, I would go with one of the other
> vendors...****
>
> ** **
>
> Compare the Fortigate 60C, for example, with the Juniper SRX210****
>
> ** **
>
> http://www.fortinet.com/products/fortigate/60C.html (look at the specs
> tab)****
>
>
> http://www.juniper.net/as/en/products-services/security/srx-series/srx210/#specs
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Similar pricing for the base models, but the Fortigate has a bit more
> functionality at that price point, IMO.****
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
>
> ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> *ASB
> **http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* <http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker>*
> **Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations & Information Security)
> for the SMB market…*****
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Richard McClary <
> richard.mccl...@aspca.org> wrote:****
>
> Interesting, thanks!****
>
>  ****
>
> As for Juniper, might you have any opinions on the Juniper SRX line (uses
> JunOS) vs the SSG line (uses ScreenOS)?  I know the SRX has about 4 times
> the throughput of the SSG line.****
>
>  ****
>
> Thanks again…****
>
> --****
>
> richard****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 26, 2013 8:22 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Semi OT: Cisco versus Checkpoint & Juniper
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> At the low to mid-range, Juniper (with their SSG line) is more than
> price/feature competitive with CheckPoint, et al.  Things get dicier when
> you get up into the multi Gbit range, but for the scope of what was
> requested, they are a good fit.****
>
>  ****
>
> Juniper messed up Netscreen from an organizational standpoint.  That's why
> some of them left (at the time of the acquisition) and formed Fortinet.***
> *
>
>  ****
>
> PA is more feature rich than the others, but the pricing is not for the
> faint of heart, especially at the lower-end of the scale.****
>
>  ****
>
> Fortinet has a really good mix of feature and pricing, but I'm not happy
> with what they did at the low end with their last OS release -- allegedly
> in the name of performance/stability.  (Mind you, the features they took
> out of v5 all work with version 4 of their OS)****
>
>  ****
>
> Sophos has done really well with their acquisition of Astaro, and their
> looking to take on the mid-market with their pricing and feature bundles.*
> ***
>
>  ****
>
> Cisco strength, IMO, remains in core switch networking.  If they had to
> sell the ASAs without the benefit of the Catalyst family as a tie-in,
> they'd have given up that business long ago.  Same for their load-balancing
> prowess.   Neither their pricing nor their feature set are appealing in
> areas outside of their core.****
>
>  ****
>
> CheckPoint licensing has still not been simplified to the degree that I
> would like, and their strengths are more suited to large enterprises than
> SMB or the mid-market space.   Not a bad product by any stretch of the
> imagination, but you can get more for your money elsewhere.****
>
>  ****
>
> That's just my view of the landscape...****
>
>
> ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> *ASB
> *
> *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* <http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker>*
> **Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations & Information Security)
> for the SMB market…*****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Patrick Salmon <psal...@gmail.com>
> wrote:****
>
> Yes. YMMV but the last client I worked with who looked hard at the very
> compelling PA story changed their mind after the sticker shock hit.****
>
>  ****
>
> Oh and ASB, you quite sure about that? This came out last month at the MWC
> in Barcelona.
> http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/26/us-juniper-review-idUSBRE91P0S220130226?feedType=RSS&feedName=technologyNews&utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter&dlvrit=56505
> ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Kurt Buff <kurt.b...@gmail.com> wrote:**
> **
>
> I haven't priced the PA stuff, but I had somehow picked up the idea that
> they were less expensive than Cisco.
>
> Am I wrong about that?
>
> I hope not, because everything I've heard about their products is
> tantalizing...
>
> Kurt****
>
>  ****
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Andrew S. Baker <asbz...@gmail.com>
> wrote:****
>
> I would have mentioned the PA devices, but Pierre did indicate some price
> sensitivity... :)****
>
>
> ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> *ASB
> *
> *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* <http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker>*
> **Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations & Information Security)
> for the SMB market…*****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Kurt Buff <kurt.b...@gmail.com> wrote:***
> *
>
> And I'm quite anxious to lay my hands upon a Palo Alto device and see what
> it can do.
>
> EZ can probably talk your ear off about that...
>
> Kurt****
>
>  ****
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Andrew S. Baker <asbz...@gmail.com>
> wrote:****
>
> Hi Pierre,****
>
>  ****
>
> I'm not that fond of Cisco in the UTM space...****
>
>  ****
>
> I would definitely select Juniper over Cisco, and Juniper will be better
> priced than CheckPoint.****
>
>  ****
>
> Are you able to get Sophos UTM devices?  They have a very robust UTM line,
> and the pricing is better than many.****
>
>  ****
>
> There's also Fortinet, although I'm not happy about what they've done with
> v5 in taking away some of the features from the lower-end of the product
> line. ****
>
>  ****
>
> Regards,****
>
>  ****
>
>
> ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> *ASB
> **http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* <http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker>*
> **Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations & Information Security)
> for the SMB market…*****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Pierre-Marie Camilleri <
> pmcamill...@laferla.com.mt> wrote:****
>
> Hi all****
>
>  ****
>
> Thought of posting this here in order to obtain some feedback. I am
> planning to replace our old firewall and have been looking at both
> Checkpoint and Juniper UTM appliances. Prices aren’t cheap and was
> wondering how Cisco compares with these products (pricewise and features).
> ****
>
> What we need is a UTM appliance offering Firewall, IPS, VPN  and Web
> Filtering. Does Cisco sell such an appliance and what are your experiences
> (good/bad)  of using Cisco for your network security.****
>
>  ****
>
> TIA****
>
> Pierre****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin****
>
>  ****
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin****
>
>  ****
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin****
>
>  ****
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin****
>
>  ****
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin****
>
>  ****
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin****
>
>  ****
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin****
>
> ** **
>
>
> The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is
> from The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals®
> (ASPCA®) and is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and
> may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are
> not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination, distribution, copying or use of the contents of this e-mail,
> and any attachments hereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me by reply email and
> permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any
> printout thereof. ****
>
> ** **
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin****
>
> ** **
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin****
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to