As far as I know we have 50 MB limits per person total. I don't think there is any one user with stores less than 1 GB that was doing what they were told to do.
Jon On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Eric Woodford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The limits on the store are fairly high, like 70gb for Exchange 2003 > Standard. (IIRC). At one former employer, they allowed the C-class to have > basically limitless mailboxes. Warning and Send limits (at 2gb), but no cap > on receive. Using Mailbox management, to clear deleted Items folders, and > very old mail (keep REALLY old mail in PSTs and/or archive to CD) can > typically keep the server below the 70gb limits. > > It's the Exchange Admin and the hardware that impose the only limits here. > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Jon Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Yeah, I saw and understood that but I know the limits of the store so I > > am fairly sure I will not be uploading any of the PST's for any user. Most > > have been on PST's for close to 6 or more years so I doubt many will be > > small enough to fit within the size limitations. We are part State Agency > > and part State University Division. So little of what is received can > > actually be deleted outside of SPAM. > > > > Jon > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Salvador Manzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I'm pulling a bit of Ben's post out to make it more clear, since it's > > > kind > > > of buried and hitting on a particular concern of Jon's > > > > > > > > > On 2/27/08 6:57 AM, "Ben Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Jon Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > >> Can OST and PST files live on the same system? > > > >> Be open at the same time? > > > > > > > > Yes and yes. When Outlook is an Exchange client, the Exchange > > > > mailbox (server and/or OST) shows up at "Mailbox - Username" in the > > > > Folder List. Any PSTs the user opens show up as additional > > > top-level > > > > icons in the Folder List. > > > > > > > > If you haven't already, read the Exchange FAQ entry for "PST = > > > BAD". > > > > I'm aware that you're living in the same imperfect world the rest > > > of > > > > us are, but you should at least know what the issues are. > > > <more chop> > > > > > > > > > There is NOTHING stopping you from keeping the old PSTs around. > > > However, > > > you may want to speak with your Exchange admin and talk about whether > > > these > > > old PSTs will be migrated into the Exchange server (i.e. is capacity > > > built > > > in to the new structure to allow it), and to have the Exchange admin > > > talk > > > with the business side regarding the pros and cons of migrating the > > > PSTs in, > > > so that you can lay down an acceptable risk scenario. > > > > > > ----- > > > Salvador Manzo [ 620 W. 35th St - Los Angeles, CA 90089 e. > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > > > Auxiliary Services IT, Datacenter > > > University of Southern California > > > 818-612-5112 > > > An avidity to punish is always dangerous to liberty. It leads men to > > > stretch, to misinterpret, and to misapply even the best of laws. He > > > that > > > would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from > > > oppression; > > > for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will > > > reach to > > > himself. > > > Thomas Paine, "Dissertation on First Principles of Government" > > > > > > > > > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ > > > ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~ > > > > > > > > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
