Talking to Exchange 2003 have not had issues using/not using cached mode
From: Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 7:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Why is Search so crap in Outlook 2007 Okay, let me ask this. The people not having issues, what type of account / accounts are you using? Perhaps if connected to Exchange, it has to talk to the server for search, and that's what causing the problem? Just a theory. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue." - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me From: David L Herrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 09:14 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Why is Search so crap in Outlook 2007 Ditto From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 5:32 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Why is Search so crap in Outlook 2007 Same here... From: Christopher J.. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 8:21 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Why is Search so crap in Outlook 2007 Actually, I have yet to have a problem with the instant search in Outlook 2007. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue." - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me From: Andy Crellin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 06:40 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Why is Search so crap in Outlook 2007 Small rant coming up. The one overriding piece of crapness with MS kit that has been a thorn in my side for the last year has been Instant Search in Outlook 2007. It just doesn't work. I have read Lord knows how many blogs and articles on the subject but so far it seems there is still no consensus as to why it fails to operate for any longer than a week or so at a time. Last week I tried rebuilding all the indexes - usually a winner, however this time... no dice. So I discover _another_ new article explaining that unchecking (!!!) the folder in question from the list of folders to be searched works. This didn't work for me, however I found that unchecking the box, killing Outlook, starting outlook, checking the box again and then killing and starting Outlook again kicked the indexer off correctly and it reindexed all the mailboxes and PSTs correctly. One week later and suddenly I am only getting results from the last week from my mailbox (which contains about 4 months worth of email) - results from all PSTs are being returned fine. I am about to go back through the "fix" again to try to resolve the issue, but thought, through a mixed haze of anger and incredulity that I should share my pain and see if others are still having this problem with Search! Has anyone had Instant Search working correctly, consistently? Cheers for listening... Andy. Andy Crellin Technical Services Manager Leonard Cheshire Disability Telephone: 01904 479200 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Change the way you see disability. Find out more at www.CreatureDiscomforts.org <http://www.creaturediscomforts.org/> Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard Cheshire Disability does not accept any liability for the content of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire Disability. If you have received this transmission in error, please contact the sender and delete it immediately. Leonard Cheshire Disability is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England no: 552847, and a registered charity no: 218186 (England & Wales) and no: SC005117 (Scotland) VAT no: 899 3223 75. Registered office: 30 Millbank, London SW1P 4QD. This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of Names in the News. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Names in the News company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
<<image001.jpg>>
