Same here, I just deployed 120 HP dc5800 with Core 2Duo E8400 3.0Ghz
Processor and 2Gb of Ram, Vista and Office 2007 and my users are very
happy, much better performance than P4 with 3.4Ghz and XP!

__________________________________________________
Stefan Jafs 

-----Original Message-----
From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: May-10-08 11:50
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: R: Why XP is doomed

I think you are right . Windows Xp was sucking a lot on a PentiumIII
1ghz machine with 256MB RAM, where Win 98 was really "fast".
I am now deploying Q6600 or T9300 machines with Vista and 4GB RAM and I
am quite satisfied.


GuidoElia
HELPPC

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Inviato: sabato 10 maggio 2008 16.44
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: Why XP is doomed


MS's earnings were disappointing? Welcome to 2008. They can stand in
line with the other 80% of companies with the same problems.

As for support, XP has been around since 2001 and mainstream support
goes until Apr. 2009.
That's a damn long life cycle for any software maker. This is the same
whining that went on with Windows 98 and Windows 2000. I don't remember
the world ending in either case. Think about what other software was
released in
2001 and if it's still support. I wonder if Adobe still supports
Photoshop 6.0? I'll bet Apple still supports OSX 10.0.0, but Apple seems
to be living the rock star life these days.

Now Ill also say I'm still a HUGE XP fan. I use XP at home on all my
machines. My work machine is Vista and while I don't really dislike it,
it really doesn't do much for me either. But eventually the time will
come to upgrade, and I'm sure my world won't end either. The "Vista
sucks" thing has certainly taken on a life of its own. I would venture
to guess that a very large percentage of the people who say it sucks
have never tried it.
It doesn't totally suck, it's just....slightly sucky. Frankly if they
could just get it to perform better, it would be great.

-----Original Message-----
From: Angus Scott-Fleming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 7:20 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Why XP is doomed

Interesting analysis from Cringely.  As always, "follow the money" ...

------- Included Stuff Follows -------
I, Cringely . The Pulpit . Wimpy | PBS

    ...

    Several readers are concerned about Microsoft's decision to stop
selling

    Windows XP and -- most importantly -- end security updates for the 
    venerable operating system. This has everything to do with business
and 
    nothing at all to do with technology. Wearing my business reporter's

    fedora, then, I'll point you back a week or so to Microsoft's most
recent 
    earnings announcement, which disappointed Wall Street. This is
significant 
    because it is hard to find a Wall Street analyst who remembers the
last 
    time Microsoft's earnings were disappointing. It simply doesn't
happen. 
    That's because Microsoft has a myriad of tools for adjusting the
numbers

    to look just right.

    Because Microsoft has so many tools for fine-tuning its financials 
    (primarily the management of expenses, by the way -- Microsoft makes
so 
    much money that it tunes the numbers by throwing cash away), the
fact that 
    this last set of numbers disappointed suggests to me that they, too,
could 
    have been avoided. Microsoft probably decided to deliberately take
an 
    earnings hit precisely so they could play the "we have to get the
earnings 
    up" card to justify the final death of XP.

    Microsoft has been under huge pressure from its hardware OEMs to
dump XP, 
    thus forcing millions of customers who have been avoiding Vista and 
    Vista's inevitable hardware upgrade to finally buy new computers.
Dumping 
    XP will help Dell and HP AND Microsoft, big-time. It won't do
anything for 
    you or me, though, since Vista still sucks, but we obviously don't
matter.

    Those customers who think they'll keep XP going on their own will
probably 
    be out of luck, too. With Microsoft abandoning security upgrades,
hackers 
    will eat holes in the old OS practically overnight. And if one or
more of 
    the security companies like Symantec or McAfee think they can make a

    business out of defending XP, I simply doubt that customers will
pay.

--------- Included Stuff Ends ---------
Other topics also discussed in his column here:
http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2008/pulpit_20080509_004880.html


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~


This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Amico 
Corpoartion company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure 
no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility 
for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~

Reply via email to