No SBS in our environment. We have 150+ servers. For storage we have EMC FC.

Original Message:
-----------------
From: Jim Slattery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:42:14 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Excahnge Setup


I've been sent in to clean up a couple installations where they put SBS on
a VM, including the data store volumes.
 
In both of these cases, ended up with 474 errors in ESE... which according
to MS is generally caused by a hardware (disk subsystem) problem. There
being no physical disk subsystem that the VM sees, I'm thinking it's a
problem with I/O delay that causes store database corruption.
 
So, don't do that.  Use external storage of some sort. (iSCSI has been very
good to me).
 
Sorry if this seems like a simple no-brainer, but I know someone out there
is doing it wrong, at least twice that I've seen and had to fix. 


> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:26:22 +1000> Subject: RE: Excahnge Setup> > SCR
generally gives you a bit more flexibility than CCR. See:
http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2007/06/28/445538.aspx> for a list of
differences> > You can certainly run Exchange in a VM. Just be aware that
virtualisation always adds overhead of some level, so if you are currently
I/O constrained (i.e. I/O is bottlenecking your systems) then virtualising
will just make the situation worse.> > Now, the higher end virtualisation
products all allow direct disk access (i.e. you can add a LUN as a disk to
the VM), and the overhead is reasonably low (around 10%). If you can
provide enough spindles and LUNs, then you can get Exchange working in VMs
with respect to the performance issues.> > Cheers> Ken> > -----Original
Message-----> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday,
12 July 2008 2:43 AM> To: NT System Admin Issues> Subject: Excahnge Setup>
> Can any of you Exchange guys comment on your preference for using Stanby>
Continuous Replication or Cluster continuous replication? Also, running>
Exchange as VM's. some prefer not to run Exchange as VM's because of the>
I/O contention problems. That is why we are running Notes on physical
boxes.> > Mike> > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with
Ninja! ~> ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web.com – Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft®
Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~

Reply via email to