I did create a new account, but it almost seems as if the old one is still
trying to activate again

2008/8/13 Oliver Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>  Perhaps you could create a new account for them without the hotmail
> blocking etc. That would get the settings applied from the outset, rather
> than waiting for the servers to sync.
>
>
>
> Also, what about setting a smart host on the mail server as a work around ?
>
>
>
> Olly
>
>
>
> *From:* James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* 13 August 2008 14:02
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: OpenDNS
>
>
>
> The thing that is doing my head in is that I have even listed the domains
> on the "never block" list, and the changes apparently still haven't
> propagated. Other things have though, like my customised message. I am
> within a few hours of binning them and just letting him browse the Internet
> unprotected :-(
>
> 2008/8/13 Oliver Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Well, we get email probs if the recipient domain is on the opendns list of
> things to block. Its blocks at the DNS level so will happily block MX as
> well as A records. Updates have never taken more than about 1 hour for us
> though.
>
>
>
> *From:* James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* 13 August 2008 13:47
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* OpenDNS
>
>
>
> Does anyone on the list have any issues with OpenDNS? I recommended this to
> a friend of mine, and it appears to be behaving rather strangely. When it is
> enabled in their DNS forwarders, it appears to block email as well as web
> traffic to domains such as hotmail.com and btinternet.com - as soon as the
> DNS settings are removed, the Exchange queues clear. Also he made some
> changes to allow webmail in his OpenDNS settings, and six hours later, they
> are still getting blocked when browsing to hotmail.com or Yahoo mail. I
> have sent a few requests to their support teams, but haven't even received
> as much as an auto-response yet.
>
> TIA,
>
>
>
>
>
> JRR
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 3352 (20080813) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 3352 (20080813) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to