We add SEC to the end of all the Security groups. That way it is something no one ever sees in an address book. Not that it is a big issue, just cleaner looking. And different OU's of course.
We have 233 DL's for 800 employee's. Not that I am proud of that. From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 4:13 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Security group / dist list I keep them in separate OUs too, but have the DL as a marker to differentiate them when I am looking at a user's group memberships. I hate scrolling to the right :-) 2008/9/11 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> "Sherry Abercrombie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote on 09/11/2008 12:22:54 PM: > I keep them in different OUs. Some but not all distribution lists > will have DL in the name. I don't have DLs here (I'm a victim of Lotus Notes ...), but I used to append "-DL" to the name, to differentiate them from regular security groups. > On 9/10/08, David Lum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > How do you guys differentiate your security group names from > distribution list names in AD? > David Lum > SYSTEMS ENGINEER // NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION > [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // 971.222.1025 > > > > > > > > -- > Sherry Abercrombie > > "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." > Arthur C. Clarke > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
