Sorry I'm so far behind with this, but we looked at all of the usual suspects, and narrowed it down to Aruba & Meru. We ended up going with Meru, because the throughput is quite a bit higher, especially with mixed b/g/n clients. If you have one b client, Aruba (& Motorola, Cisco) will reduce all of your clients to 11Mbps.
Derek Harris Systems Administrator Panorama Orthopedics & Spine Center If you want to be free, there is but one way; it is to guarantee an equally full measure of liberty to all your neighbors. There is no other. - Carl Schurz From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 9:06 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Wireless upgrade to 802.11n We use (and sell) Aruba. I have not done the N yet but have G deployed through my office and it is the only method our staff use to connect to the network. We have not had one minute of unplanned downtime with the Aruba in the year we have used it. Not a single one. I love this part. It is the choice of wireless infrastructure for the Defcon and BlackHat conferences, and to me that says a hell of a lot. http://www.scscblogs.com/catalysttech/index.php/2008/08/aruba-networks-withstands-defcon-16-and-black-hat-conferences/ From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 6:56 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Wireless upgrade to 802.11n We are going to replace our 802.11a wireless with 802.11n. So far, we have narrowed it down to: Motorola Cisco Aruba It's a small wireless network of only 31 AP's, for now, which includes clinical staff and a "guest" wirelss. Has anybody rolled out 802.11n and, if so, who did you go with? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Memorial Medical Center 231-845-2319 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
