2003 sp2, R2 did it as well. I have one server whose snap volume is an iSCSI mounted block device and it even does it...
jlc From: Alverson, Tom (Xetron) [mailto:tom.alver...@ngc.com] Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 11:18 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Shadow copy question I have only had it dump the old snaps (due to excess load) when they were on the same physical drive. On one server I added another drive just to hold the snaps and have not had a problem since (with Windows 2003 server). What version of Windows server are you running (2003 or 2008?) From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 1:09 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Shadow copy question Yup, Shadow Copies are the greatest thing, too bad the implementation is a steaming pile of merde. I have no end of issues with VSS, even though the store is directed off to a new controller and set of spindles, it seems when IO climbs to any moderate level, VSS tanks and kills all the old snaps, even when it's not performing a snap! Why it needs to tank all the _old_ snaps I have no idea. I hate it... On my file servers with it enabled, it seems that large IO is met with pauses and disconnects regardless if a snap is being performed or not. jlc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
