As I mentioned before, I like Linksys products for lots of things, but
they have always tested weak in relation to IPSec VPN throughput.

I would strongly recommend against using them unless you have seen
numbers that show a particular model to be comparitively better than
similar competitor models.

Its only because of weak encryption horsepower.  If you can, always
try to get something with a secondary processor that is reserved for
encryption processing.

--
ME2



On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Gene Giannamore
<gene.giannam...@abideinternational.com> wrote:
> Its funny, because of a few Linksys routers, they were advertising 50 or even 
> 70 vpns. After playing with them and getting them to work, that number is the 
> max number of defined vpns. It takes a little while to figure out to setup 
> Linksys vpns, static ip on at least one end, and psk, is not too bad. The 
> newer routers are a little easier, if you have banged your head on them a few 
> times. Reading thru their KB and reading linksysinfo.org helps if you have 
> the time.
> All the local experts around here always seem to use non-linksys cisco 
> products for vpns.
>
> Gene Giannamore
> Abide International Inc.
> Technical Support
> 561 1st Street West
> Sonoma,Ca.95476
> (707) 935-1577    Office
> (707) 935-9387    Fax
> (707) 766-4185    Cell
> gene.giannam...@abideinternational.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:21 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN?
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Sam Cayze <sam.ca...@rollouts.com> wrote:
>  > Does anybody have any experience with the Cisco/Linksys RVS4000?
>
>  Not that one in particular, but I've had exposure to a few different
> LinkSys encryption boxes in the past, and they've all sucked.
> Inadequate processing power (slow).  Bad documentation, confusing web
> UI.  Suspect security design.  Unreliable -- they'd drop the tunnel,
> or stop routing packets, or just plain lock up -- all requiring a
> power-cycle to fix.
>
>  This was from before Cisco had sunk their teeth into LinkSys, but I
> haven't really seen any change in product quality in their other
> stuff.
>
>  LinkSys makes okay SOHO stuff for light usage, but if you're looking
> at VPNs you're outside of that product space, in my opinion.
>
> -- Ben
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to