Generally but depending on requirements it could be ok for him. We are running an offsite warehouse with computers, ip phones, network printers, etc with Cable at their end and DSL at ours and it's been rock solid. Most providers offer business class services with SLA's now.
________________________________ From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 7:23 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN? Because DSL/Cable have limited uplink bandwidth, generally. From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonwelding.com] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 8:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN? Why spend that when you could do it with a couple ASA's and DSL/Cable Connections. ________________________________ From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 1:44 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: R: Site to Site VPN? Go with MPLS and 2 Cisco routers (1800 or 2800 series) GuidoElia HELPPC ________________________________ Da: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] Inviato: giovedì 5 marzo 2009 20.54 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Site to Site VPN? We may be needing a VPN connection to our remote data center in the near future for a small office, about 20 users. Does anybody have any experience with the Cisco/Linksys RVS4000? I tried a SonicWall once, it was way over my head, and support was horrendous. This will operate solely as 2 VPN endpoints to connect 2 LANs. Users needing remote access already have Win 2003 RRAS in place. Thanks for any input, Sam http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps9923/ps9928/data_sheet_c78-496735.html ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
