Bill,
Also be aware that at this time Forefront, while one anti-malware suite, is not 
all run from one console. Client Security, Exchange and SharePoint Security all 
need their own consoles to manage them. Having one console to run all A/M for 
your network will/should be included in the next version (Sterling).
Tim

From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 9:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Forefront?

No it does not come with SQL but you will need it.  I found that out the hard 
way and the management piece will not work with Express it must have Analysis 
Services to run.

Jon
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Bill Lambert 
<blamb...@concuity.com<mailto:blamb...@concuity.com>> wrote:

Wow...what a great responses!  Thanks, everyone for the input.



I'm going to be meeting with the tech's from other offices tomorrow and will 
suggest Forefront for Exchange and client machines as a possible solution.  If 
I'm reading the literature correctly, FF for Exchange does do antispam so 
that's encouraging.  And it comes with an installation of SQL that is dedicated 
to FF.



Again, thanks a million!



Bill Lambert

Concuity

847-941-9206



From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com<mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com>]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 5:50 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Forefront?



I didn't and would not suggest waiting either.  I was only making a comment on 
the fact there are issues within certain context that I would hope are fixed in 
the next version.  Thanks though for letting me know about the push backs on 
the the releases.



Jon

On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Steve Burkett 
<steve.burk...@stemcor.com<mailto:steve.burk...@stemcor.com>> wrote:

Don't wait on the next version coming out, they pushed the Client Security 2.0 
back to first half of 2010 the other day, and the Forefront Server Security for 
Exchange back to the fourth quarter of 2009.



http://blogs.technet.com/forefront/archive/2009/04/03/schedule-update-for-forefront-stirling.aspx



Quite like how the ForeFront for Exchange and Sharepoint packages can run 
anti-virus engines from Kaspersky Labs, CA and Sophos so you could be quite 
covered by the different definitions from various manufacturers.



Microsoft OneCare was the consumer product they're ditching.





From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com<mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com>]
Sent: 09 April 2009 10:11

To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: Re: Forefront?



Some if the things you need to watch out for are whether you are putting it on 
Windows 2008 or 2003,  do you own SQL 2005 or 2008, are you using any of the 
System Center products.  Like John the EDU discount just about kills any price 
competition.  I use it here for that reason.  I have had to touch it rarely, it 
works, it does seem to catch bugs, but it is not simple to setup if you have 
any of the mixture I mentioned to watch out for.  There is a new version coming 
out that I hope will remove many of the issues I had.  It does need a full SQL 
to install and function correctly but it can be installed without the 
management portion but why do that.  Considering how hard NOD32 was to set up 
and get running Forefront could be done by a teenager.  Considering just the 
install of the management portion NOD beat on the install but getting the 
configuration correct was much easier to do on Forefront.



If you have any specific questions I will try to help but there are others 
using it that I know have more experience than me on the llist.



Jon

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:40 PM, John Hornbuckle 
<john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us<mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us>> 
wrote:

We use it, but I'm hardly an expert on it. To be honest, I don't mess with it 
much. Which I guess could be viewed as a good thing!  :)



I like that it's integrated with AD and WSUS-pushing it down to clients and 
keeping it updated is simple.



I don't really know how to judge its efficacy. We've not had any known malware 
infections while using it, but we also keep our workstations locked pretty 
tight (e.g., users don't have admin rights and with many accounts we restrict 
executables using GPO).



We like the pricing; as an educational entity, we get deep discounts from 
Microsoft.









John Hornbuckle

MIS Department

Taylor County School District

www.taylor.k12.fl.us<http://www.taylor.k12.fl.us/>







From: Bill Lambert [mailto:blamb...@concuity.com<mailto:blamb...@concuity.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 7:12 PM

To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: Forefront?



Hello all...



I'm tired of using multiple products to protect desktops and email from spam, 
viruses and spyware.  I've taken a look at the MS Forefront product line and it 
looks like a pretty good solution.  I have Exchange 2003 and XP clients.



Can anyone comment on its effectiveness, installation, management and use both 
at the admin and user levels?



Any other recommendations are welcome as well.



Thanks.



Bill Lambert

Windows System Administrator

Concuity

A healthcare division of Trintech, Inc.

Phone  847-941-9206

Fax  847-465-9147

[cid:image001.gif@01C9BA15.D01F1FB0]

NASDAQ: TTPA

The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, 
is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) 
named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive 
information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received 
this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, 
or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all 
copies of this message.  Thank you.



















===
STEMCOR CONFIDENTIALITY AND DISCLAIMER NOTICE
This e-mail is intended only for the addressees named in it. The contents 
should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. Any views or 
opinions presented are solely those of the sender and do not necessarily 
represent those of Stemcor unless otherwise specifically stated. Stemcor does 
not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message nor 
responsibility for any change made to it after it was sent by the original 
sender. You are advised to carry out a virus check before opening any 
attachment as Stemcor does not accept liability for any damage sustained as a 
result of any software viruses. You should be aware that Stemcor reserves the 
right to read incoming and outgoing emails.
===




















~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

<<inline: image001.gif>>

Reply via email to