wow, get outta my head <grin> ... just commented on bricks level before seeing your intelligent comment !
Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, & Security _____ From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 2:44 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Amusing Also assuming there are no mailbox level backups... that would break SIS's beauty. _____ From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 1:41 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Amusing I thought that even if you open an attachment locally, SIS integrity is maintained, and a copy is created in your local temp folder structure ( had a security issue once with sensitive documents persisting in the temp folders ) from a pointer to the original single instance ( unless you're just referring to the overhead on cpu/disk io/bandwidth from 450 simultaneous hits ) Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, & Security _____ From: David Lum [mailto:david....@nwea.org] Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 2:37 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Amusing SIS means that while he sent that 9MB file to 3000 users, if all 3000 are on the same Exchange server then there's only 9MB stored..now, if say, 450 of them decide to open the file or download the file to their desktop around the same time, you might have an issue.. David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
