Would that I could, brother... -----Original Message----- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:25 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Amusing
That's easy - just hard code a setting to reject any email over 3mb in size. Heh. On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 18:22, John Hornbuckle <john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us> wrote: > And while th�����s not a best practice, it���s a reality in many > organizations���so Exchan�����s designers must take the possibility into > account. > > > > > > > > John Hornbuckle > > MIS Department > > Taylor County School District > > www.taylor.k12.fl.us > > > > > > > > > > From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 6:36 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Amusing > > > > Sounds like you���re using Exchange as a file server > > > > Thanks, > > Brian Desmond > > br...@briandesmond.com > > > > c - 312.731.3132 > > > > From: Richard Stovall [mailto:richard.stov...@researchdata.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 5:24 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Amusing > > > > Yikes!�� Ours is 1�� (Printing company - lots of huge files flying around���) > > > > From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 5:38 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Amusing > > > > The O����s requirement is not the norm. > > > > The perf improvements that were achieved by cutting this feature (which was > conceived when say a 9GB SCSI drive cost a lot of money) far outweighs the > storage requirement. > > > > Go in perfmon on your Exchange server and go under MSExchangeIS > Private/Public or MSExchange Mailbox/Public and add the Single Instance > Ratio counter to your perfmon. I bet it w�����t be as high as you think it is. > > > > Thanks, > > Brian Desmond > > br...@briandesmond.com > > > > c - 312.731.3132 > > > > From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:12 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Amusing > > > > ����ll have to ponder that one a bit. Not sure I like it. Disks may be cheap, > but eliminating SIS would cause storage requirements to increase by an order > of magnitude. The O����s situation is a prime exampl���� Suddenly a 9 MB > storage > requirement becomes 2.7 GB storage requirement (if my math is right). > > > > > > > > From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 4:10 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Amusing > > > > 3000x9 > > > > Disks are cheap, Exchange 2010 is designed to run RAID-less on large SATA > (e.g. 1TB) drives. 1 database per SATA driv����� TX logs & DB on the same > volume. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Brian Desmond > > br...@briandesmond.com > > > > c - 312.731.3132 > > > > Active Directory, 4th Ed - http://www.briandesmond.com/ad4/ > > Microsoft MVP - https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Brian > > > > From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 2:57 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Amusing > > > > How does Ex 2010 work regarding SIS? If it doe�����t use it, does it use some > similar technology? Or would the O����s 9 MB file now take 3000x9 MB of space? > > > > > > > > John Hornbuckle > > MIS Department > > Taylor County School District > > 318 North Clark Street > > Perry, FL 32347 > > > > www.taylor.k12.fl.us > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
