I saw Joe's earlier post, but it did show up under a different thread in gmail. Same subject line, but not grouped with the rest of the messages.
Jeff On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Joe Tinney <jtin...@lastar.com> wrote: > I'm not all warmed up. :-) > > I totally listed the possibility that you didn't see my reply right after I > mentioned that it was a repeat. This isn't 'at' anyone.. just more of a > general question, I suppose. > > And, admittedly, a bit of a whinefest. > > It's frustrating to learn so much from a community and then try and give > back multiple times to be seemingly 'ignored'. That's all. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:can...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 2:49 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: FYI: Reports of Outlook automatic archiving activating after > patching this weekend > > Dude? > Chill out. > I didn't see your suggestion. > > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Joe Tinney<jtin...@lastar.com> wrote: > > Am I invisible here? Do I need more life points or something? First my > version questions skims by and now a repeat suggestion (though those do > happen quite often and you can't always catch every reply). Candee at least > had a link and that is more useful than me just throwing it out there. Oh, > well. > > > > WTB LifePoints4NTSysAdmin > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:can...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 2:37 PM > > To: NT System Admin Issues > > Subject: Re: FYI: Reports of Outlook automatic archiving activating after > patching this weekend > > > > This happened to me when I installed Office SP2. > > I found this: > > http://almostdailytech.com/tag/office-2007-sp2/ > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Micheal Espinola > > Jr<michealespin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Sorry for neglecting that bit. For the people I am involved with, its > been > >> 2007. But it hasn't been everyone. > >> > >> -- > >> ME2 > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Rob Bonfiglio <robbonfig...@gmail.com > > > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> What verion(s) of Outlook? > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Micheal Espinola Jr > >>> <michealespin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I've seen sporadic reports online, and can confirm sporadic instances > >>>> within an organization I deal with, that some systems that had patches > >>>> applied over the weekend that were installed via AU caused Outlook to > "try > >>>> to start for the first time". This process, along with the standard > startup > >>>> dialog that many of us are familiar with also came with a dialog box > that > >>>> appeared to be an automatic archive (two folders passing papers with a > >>>> changing list of folders being processed.) > >>>> > >>>> In every case I am aware of; automatic updates was *not* enabled. > >>>> > >>>> I have been unable at this time to research further or confirm if an > >>>> archiving actually took place. Someone also posted about it in the MS > >>>> forums: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx?dg=microsoft.public.outlook.general&tid=f53bb4ee-9c15-434d-aab9-05c45017ba4e&cat=&lang=&cr=&sloc=&p=1&mid=f53bb4ee-9c15-434d-aab9-05c45017ba4e > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> ME2 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
