As was my reply... ;-)

-sc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 4:52 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: FYI: Reports of Outlook automatic archiving activating
> after patching this weekend
> 
> It was a joke...
> 
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:44, Steven M. Caesare<[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Why would everybody worry about you being an idiot?
> >
> > -sc
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 3:12 PM
> >> To: NT System Admin Issues
> >> Subject: Re: FYI: Reports of Outlook automatic archiving activating
> >> after patching this weekend
> >>
> >> Odd.
> >>
> >> Maybe that's why some of my messages aren't getting responses.
> >>
> >> I just figured it was because everyone knows I'm an idiot, and
> didn't
> >> worry about it.
> >>
> >> Heh.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:07, Joe Tinney<[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > I'm subscribed via email.
> >> >
> >> > Invisible by email = sad. Invisible in person = superpower. Who
> knew!
> >> >
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> > Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 3:04 PM
> >> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> >> > Subject: Re: FYI: Reports of Outlook automatic archiving
> activating
> >> after patching this weekend
> >> >
> >> > You are invisible.
> >> >
> >> > This is the first post I've seen from you in a while.
> >> >
> >> > Are you using the forum interface, or subscribed via email?
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:42, Joe Tinney<[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >> Am I invisible here? Do I need more life points or something?
> First
> >> my version questions skims by and now a repeat suggestion (though
> those
> >> do happen quite often and you can't always catch every reply).
> Candee
> >> at least had a link and that is more useful than me just throwing it
> >> out there. Oh, well.
> >> >>
> >> >> WTB LifePoints4NTSysAdmin
> >> >>
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> >> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 2:37 PM
> >> >> To: NT System Admin Issues
> >> >> Subject: Re: FYI: Reports of Outlook automatic archiving
> activating
> >> after patching this weekend
> >> >>
> >> >> This happened to me when I installed Office SP2.
> >> >> I found this:
> >> >> http://almostdailytech.com/tag/office-2007-sp2/
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Micheal Espinola
> >> >> Jr<[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>> Sorry for neglecting that b��������������� For the people I am involved
> with,
> >> its been
> >> >>> 20������������ But it hasn't been everyone.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> ME2
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Rob Bonfiglio
> >> <[email protected]>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> What verion(s) of Outlook?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Micheal Espinola Jr
> >> >>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> I've seen sporadic reports online, and can confirm sporadic
> >> instances
> >> >>>>> within an organization I deal with, that some systems that had
> >> patches
> >> >>>>> applied over the weekend that were installed via AU caused
> >> Outlook to "try
> >> >>>>> to start for the first tim������������������ This process, along with
> the
> >> standard startup
> >> >>>>> dialog that many of us are familiar with also came with a
> dialog
> >> box that
> >> >>>>> appeared to be an automatic archive (two folders passing
> papers
> >> with a
> >> >>>>> changing list of folders being processed.)
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> In every case I am aware of; automatic updates was *not*
> enabled.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> I have been unable at this time to research further or confirm
> if
> >> an
> >> >>>>> archiving actually took pl�����������������  Someone also posted 
> >> >>>>> about
> it in
> >> the MS
> >> >>>>> forums:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-
> >> us/default.aspx?dg=microsoft.public.outlook.general&tid=f53bb4ee-
> 9c15-
> >> 434d-aab9-05c45017ba4e&cat=&lang=&cr=&sloc=&p=1&mid=f53bb4ee-9c15-
> 434d-
> >> aab9-05c45017ba4e
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> --
> >> >>>>> ME2
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog!
> ~
> >> >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-
> Enterpri���������������������~
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog!
> ~
> >> >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>
�������� ~
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> >> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> �� ~
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> >> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/������~
> >>
> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/�� ~
> >
> >
> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/�� ~
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to