I've deployed 3 commercial solutions in this space: Quest, NetWrix, and NetPro (purchased by Quest last year). I'm pretty sure the NetWrix and NetPro solutions didnt' REQUIRE a domain, but I can't currently access them to verify.
I could develop something for you in a few days probably, modifying code that's already on my blog. If I charged you for it, would that provide you a commercial solution? :-) ________________________________________ From: Ben Scott [mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 6:59 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Filter Vista security log to show only audit failures? On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Michael B. Smith<mich...@owa.smithcons.com> wrote: > Eh, the main changes in Vista (and Server 2008, and Win7 and Server 2008 R2, > etc. etc.) were to provide the "programmer" with more control and fewer > limitations. Yah, I saw all the additional logs Vista added. I gather that's great for app developers. But we've also been told for years that all the problems with the security log would be Fixed In The Next Release. Bah. Humbug. > Third parties are the solution (and yes, there are FREE as in OSS solutions > in this space). Getting OSS solutions approved for the particular computers this is needed for would be... problematic. Any commercial solutions you can recommend that *don't* require a network, a server, and/or a domain? Specifically for the logging of changes to DACLs and SACLs. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
