Any company can have gaps, especially subsidiaries.

While I was on site at a rather large unnamed chip manufacturing
company (many years ago) they lost the PDC (NT3.51 or NT4 long ago).
So they promoted the BDC.  It went boom and keeled over and died.
They went to restore from backups.....   It turned out not to be a
good week for some folks.  They also decided that 1 PDC and 1 BDC was
not perhaps the best ratio for a resource domain of over 20,000
objects in the future.

The management did turn this into a 'learning opportunity' for the
site.  No one was fired (the management believed they had just paid
for the learning experience of that mistake so might as well keep 'em)
though I believe those responsible had wished for a quick death
instead of being the 'living example' for the next two months.

Steven

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Andrew Levicki <and...@levicki.me.uk> wrote:
> I can't believe Microsoft would be responsible for not having implemented
> and tested a backup solution in any part of their business. They're always
> banging on this drum in any MS Press books about Windows Server
> administration: Do backups! Do restores! Test it!
> Next you'll be telling me they allow all their employees local admin rights
> on their computers. Oh...
> http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?postid=105
> 2009/10/12 Kennedy, Jim <kennedy...@elyriaschools.org>
>>
>> 2008ish so I vote MS failing
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2008/feb08/02-11acquisition.mspx
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 11:54 AM
>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> Subject: Re: A poke in the eye for cloud computing?
>>
>>
>>
>> I've got to assume this is a Danger failing, and not a Microsoft
>> failing.   When did Microsoft acquire Danger?
>>
>> --
>> ME2
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Ben Scott <mailvor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  Seems more like a poke in the eye for Microsoft.  How the heck do
>> you loose an entire server cluster??
>>
>> -- Ben
>>
>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to