No idea how accurate is, but there are reports that Microsoft has cut resources to Danger in deference to their Pink project.
________________________________ From: Andrew Levicki [mailto:and...@levicki.me.uk] Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 12:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: A poke in the eye for cloud computing? I can't believe Microsoft would be responsible for not having implemented and tested a backup solution in any part of their business. They're always banging on this drum in any MS Press books about Windows Server administration: Do backups! Do restores! Test it! Next you'll be telling me they allow all their employees local admin rights on their computers. Oh... http://www.itwriting.com/blog/?postid=105 2009/10/12 Kennedy, Jim <kennedy...@elyriaschools.org> 2008ish so I vote MS failing http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2008/feb08/02-11acquisition.msp x From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 11:54 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: A poke in the eye for cloud computing? I've got to assume this is a Danger failing, and not a Microsoft failing. When did Microsoft acquire Danger? -- ME2 On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Ben Scott <mailvor...@gmail.com> wrote: Seems more like a poke in the eye for Microsoft. How the heck do you loose an entire server cluster?? -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
