>  That I find to be an odd statement.
>
>  I never had to redo much with Samba.  I generally found it pretty
>easy to track most stuff.  The config is in a text file that can be
>easily put under revision control.

The shares are simple, except when a tdb tanks and you have a crappy
mapping id mapping schema involving unix and windows users (not ad).

The printer sh~t OTOH is so fricking obfuscated and so laborious I'll
forward you some humorous notes I kept later in the week. Some drivers
just don't work worth sh~t, so what do you do? Auto deploy a generic?
Visit every desktop? Bah, pay the license fee and deploy it on windows:)

>  I find that in stark contrast to MS Windows, where everything is
>hidden in the registry, and it's a common practice to nuke the *entire
>OS* to fix problems.

That's how I got good at tweaking the old RIS setups with XP:) I wouldn't
waste more than 5 minutes troubleshooting. All my apps are deployed via GPO.
Profiles and Special Folders redirected.

Poof, F12, problem solved every time, heh:)

jlc

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to