A three year old Dell laptop....not anything special at all. On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Kurt Buff <kurt.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You have a better machine than most of our folks, I suppose. We have > noticeable slowdowns on many of our machines. > > Still, it's *FAR* better than McAfee. > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 17:52, Sherry Abercrombie <saber...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > You can't be serious.....I installed Vipre on my pc and started a deep > scan > > right as my lunch hour started. Played a FPS game at lunch and never > > noticed a performance hit at all. > > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Tom Miller <tmil...@hnncsb.org> wrote: > >> > >> Welllllllllllllllll, Vipre still bogs down our PCs here when the weekly > >> deep scan is running. We get the same complaints we had when we used > >> Symantec. The quick scans are not noticed, but I'm bummed that the deep > >> scan causes a very noticeable performance loss. It's set at low > priority, > >> but still the vipre process is first/second in memory/cpu usage during > the > >> deep scans. Anything that uses those sort of resources is *not* running > at > >> low priority. > >> > >> >>> Jonathan Link <jonathan.l...@gmail.com> 10/22/2009 7:47 PM >>> > >> Or go to Vipre... > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Eric Woodford <ericwoodf...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Sorry, can't help. I hate to logoff my pc because the security team has > >>> our AV do a full scan each time I logon. It takes a good 2 hours of > 100% > >>> processing on my machine. The easy fix is to disable the AV, but... > >>> Maybe they just need to remove a few apps out of their startup, so it > >>> boots faster. > >>> > >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Andrew Levicki <and...@levicki.me.uk> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi, I've got a user who doesn't want to log off let alone shut down > >>>> their computer. > >>>> They claim that it takes too long and they haven't got time to wait to > >>>> log on again or start up. > >>>> > >>>> They're important enough that I can't force them to do so, but I'm > >>>> worried about possible problems. > >>>> The only detrimental effects that I can think of are added power > >>>> consumption and ticket expiration. > >>>> Can anybody else think of any other pitfalls or even have any > experience > >>>> of this and how did you deal with it? > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Andrew > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is > for > >> the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential > and > >> privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or > >> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, > please > >> contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the > original > >> message. > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Sherry Abercrombie > > > > "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." > > Arthur C. Clarke > > > > > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > -- Sherry Abercrombie "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Hurst, TX, United States ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
