Symantec Backup Exec 12.5 has been rock-solid in my experience.
Roger Wright ___ On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:31 AM, John Aldrich <jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com>wrote: > Ok. Let me ask this in a slightly different way then… assuming it does > what it **says** it does, do you trust *Symantec* to do the replication > for you? I know that I won’t ever use their antivirus if I’m given an > option, but I’ve never used any flavor of BackupExec, since Symantec bought > the product a few years ago. > > > > [image: John-Aldrich][image: Tile-Tools] > > > > *From:* Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 09, 2009 11:10 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Symantec Backup Exec System Restore 2010 > > > > Yes. It does a block-changed copy after the initial sync. > > > > (Warning: that’s what the documentation says, I’ve never used the specific > product.) > > > > *From:* John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 09, 2009 9:58 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Symantec Backup Exec System Restore 2010 > > > > One of my vendors is proposing using Symantec Backup Exec System Restore to > mirror two SANs. That seems like it would have a LOT of overhead and would > want to take a backup of the “primary” SAN and restore it to the D/R SAN > every time. Considering I’m trying to do this over a WAN link, and not a > dedicated point-to-point link either, I don’t think I want to try backing up > and restoring several terabytes! > > > > Am I mistaken in my understanding? All I want to do is copy the changes > from the “main” SAN to the “D/R” SAN. Would Backup Exec System Restore do > that? > > > > [image: John-Aldrich][image: Tile-Tools] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
<<image002.jpg>>
<<image001.jpg>>
