Delegate the colo people access to their part of antivirus? It seems like a waste of money/resources/etc to run a parallel infrastructure.
Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com<mailto:br...@briandesmond.com> c - 312.731.3132 From: David Lum [mailto:david....@nwea.org] Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 12:13 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: For those of you with co-location... Good Q John - we handle everything on the COLO servers, they just happen to be elsewhere. COLO and is are 80% Windows servers. I guess we're just unusual that we have two teams handling servers, they should just give them to one team (although that would be eliminating my job...). From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 9:44 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: For those of you with co-location... Depends on the OS's. Here, the same team manages the colo servers and it's anti-virus protection as well as internal servers, however, the colo stuff is all *nix and the internal stuff is all Windows, so different solutions. On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:31 AM, David Lum <david....@nwea.org<mailto:david....@nwea.org>> wrote: We have two systems infrastructures here - internal file/print/SharePoint/E-mail, and client facing web and SQL server farms. They're in separate forests with a trust. We have one team that manages the colo, but for anti-virus it's my team that handles the internal servers and workstations AV. Would you manage both sites with one solution, or run two different solutions? And which team would manage the colo AV solution? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 -- Sherry Abercrombie "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." Arthur C. Clarke ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
