I uninstalled the client last night and re-installed, and it seems to be ok
now. 

 

From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 7:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: CISCO VPN Client

 

+1

 

Altho it does tend to BSOD my Win7x64 laptop.

 

-sc

 

From: Anders Blomgren [mailto:chanks...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 7:55 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: CISCO VPN Client

 

An alternative is to use the client from Shrew Soft. I've used it on Win7
x64 to connect to both ASA and the older 3000.

http://www.shrew.net/

 

-Anders

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Terry Dickson <te...@treasurer.state.ks.us>
wrote:

Not that I can help, but what issues?  We still use the Cisco VPN Client and
many of our machines are Win7 64 machines.  Since Cisco will not make a
64bit version of the VPN Client we are looking at the anyconnect solution
also.


-----Original Message-----
From: Ray [mailto:rz...@qwest.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 9:48 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: CISCO VPN Client

We're starting to see some issues with Win7 64 clients connecting.

-----Original Message-----
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 8:19 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: CISCO VPN Client

The AnyConnect from Cisco uses a cert and is webbased, it is very easy to
work with and the users are happy with it.


--------------------------------------------------
From: "Charlie Kaiser" <charl...@golden-eagle.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 10:14 AM
To: "NT System Admin Issues" <ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>
Subject: RE: CISCO VPN Client

> Hmmm. Yeah; that's a lot of overhead. Seems a shame to have to switch apps
> because of a bad guy. That's an effective DOS attack, eh? I'd hesitate to
> switch apps because I'd be afraid they'd do the same thing. But I don't
> know
> the AnyConnect app either.
>
> I seem to remember the VPN client could use certs as part of the auth. I
> wonder if that feature could be utilized to block non-client access? I
> haven't used the Cisco client for a year or so so I don't recall the
> available options.
>
>
> ***********************
> Charlie Kaiser
> charl...@golden-eagle.org
> Kingman, AZ
> ***********************
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 7:59 AM
>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> Subject: Re: CISCO VPN Client
>>
>> They change every 20 or 30 hits.
>> Mostly out of country.
>> I started by setting up rules to block them but then I had
>> about 100 rules to block and it became an all day job.
>> Easier to move the authorized users to AnyConnect which is
>> supported and kill the VPN Client which has end of lifed anyway.
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Charlie Kaiser" <charl...@golden-eagle.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 9:54 AM
>> To: "NT System Admin Issues" <ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>
>> Subject: RE: CISCO VPN Client
>>
>> > Is there a way you can block the source IP(s) before they
>> get to the
>> > VPN endpoint?
>> >
>> > ***********************
>> > Charlie Kaiser
>> > charl...@golden-eagle.org
>> > Kingman, AZ
>> > ***********************
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
>> >> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 7:45 AM
>> >> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> >> Subject: Re: CISCO VPN Client
>> >>
>> >> I have Kiwi Syslogger setup to email me every failed attempt to
>> >> authenticate through the VPN.
>> >> It went from 2 or 3 a day from lusers to 2500 to 5000 a
>> day and all
>> >> accounts I don't have in AD and all originating from the
>> VPN tunnel.
>> >> So disabling the tunnel didn't work, had to remove the
>> reference to
>> >> the tunnel entirely.  Now we are back to 2 or 3 a day.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> From: Bob Fronk <mailto:b...@btrfronk.com>
>> >> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 9:25 AM
>> >> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> >> <mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>
>> >> Subject: RE: CISCO VPN Client
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> How did you discover this was happening?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:30 PM
>> >> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> >> Subject: Re: CISCO VPN Client
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Ok.  I am looking at that area under Remote VPN in
>> Configuration and
>> >> someone has my VPN Client info and they are trying a Brute Force
>> >> Vocab attack to my AD's.  So I have moved all my users to
>> AnyConnect
>> >> and I am ready to remove the VPN Client from the ASA or
>> disable it...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> From: Jon Harris <mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:24 PM
>> >>
>> >> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> >> <mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>
>> >>
>> >> Subject: Re: CISCO VPN Client
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Why are you getting rid of the VPN client?  You don't
>> remove it you
>> >> disable it on the ASA.  Just make sure all the rules are
>> correct for
>> >> the ASA first.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Jon
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:13 PM, David W. McSpadden
>> <dav...@imcu.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Actually on the ASA.  I think I have it found now but I am still
>> >> testing.
>> >>
>> >> From: Jon Harris <mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:10 PM
>> >>
>> >> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> >> <mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>
>> >>
>> >> Subject: Re: CISCO VPN Client
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Remove it is the best, they install into the same root directory
>> >> under Program Files but have separate directories under
>> that.  They
>> >> are separate programs as Microsoft sees them.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Jon
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:07 AM, David W. McSpadden
>> <dav...@imcu.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Anyone point me on how to Disable the old CISCO VPN Client
>> and leave
>> >> the AnyConnect still enabled?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource
>> hog! ~ ~
>> > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>> >
>>
>>
>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource
>> hog! ~ ~
>> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to