No idea... On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:35, Steven M. Caesare <scaes...@caesare.com> wrote: > Indeed. It was knowing the code name that was the hard part. > > Name of fictional MS project manager for code tools in the early 90's? > > -sc > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 12:46 PM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: Re: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? >> >> Gets the red out... >> >> That was easy. >> >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:53, Steven M. Caesare <scaes...@caesare.com> >> wrote: >> > Not many people have used SNA... we did as part of Back Office to attach >> to an AS/400 and System/36. Oof. >> > >> > The code name for the Novell gateway product, which was deigned to >> "prostitute NetWare" was "Visine". >> > >> > I'll let ya'll figure out why. :) >> > >> > -sc >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] >> >> Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 11:49 AM >> >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> >> Subject: Re: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? >> >> >> >> NetBIOS Extended User Interface, but I don't know/remember the other. >> >> I used NetBEUI with WfWg 3.0/3.1/3.11 and Netware 3.11, many moons >> ago. >> >> I also used the MSFT SNA server. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 19:01, Steven M. Caesare >> >> <scaes...@caesare.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > I'll give you a dollar if you can tell me what NetBEUI stands for >> >> > without >> >> looking it up. >> >> > >> >> > I'll double that if you can tell me the code name for MS's Gateway >> >> > Services >> >> for NetWare was while under development. >> >> > >> >> > And if you cheat and look em up u r l...@m3. >> >> > >> >> > -sc >> >> > >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> >> > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] >> >> > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 9:58 PM >> >> > To: NT System Admin Issues >> >> > Subject: Re: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? >> >> > >> >> > Weren't you still on NetBEUI just last week? >> >> > >> >> > Heh. >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 17:52, Steven M. Caesare >> >> <scaes...@caesare.com> wrote: >> >> >> I’ll probably no longer do so either, but I’ve run Windows without >> >> >> protocol stacks installed/bound previously, and if there’s a >> >> >> dependency, I’d like to see it documented. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Otherwise there shouldn’t be a checkbox next to the protocol that >> >> >> makes it just as easy to disable as File and Print sharing, which >> >> >> you can disable with relative impunity. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -sc >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Free, Bob [mailto:r...@pge.com] >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 8:41 PM >> >> >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> >> >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I think that’s expected as it’s the party line from a Microsoft >> Techwriter. >> >> >> I believe it gets the point across. With what I heard from the PFE >> >> >> that I can’t elaborate on, what Michael alluded and a few other >> >> >> cases I’ve heard of I’m not going to risk disabling it on my >> >> >> servers. It’s not worth >> >> it. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 4:12 PM >> >> >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> >> >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> That’s unfortunately nebulous. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -sc >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Free, Bob [mailto:r...@pge.com] >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 4:24 PM >> >> >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> >> >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The Argument against Disabling IPv6 >> >> >> >> >> >> It is unfortunate that some organizations disable IPv6 on their >> >> >> computers running Windows Vista or Windows Server 2008, where it >> >> >> is installed and enabled by default. Many disable IPv6-based on >> >> >> the assumption that they are not running any applications or >> >> >> services that use it. Others might disable it because of a >> >> >> misperception that having both IPv4 and IPv6 enabled effectively >> >> >> doubles their DNS and Web >> >> traffic. This is not true. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From Microsoft's perspective, IPv6 is a mandatory part of the >> >> >> Windows operating system and it is enabled and included in >> >> >> standard Windows service and application testing during the >> >> >> operating system development >> >> process. >> >> >> Because Windows was designed specifically with IPv6 present, >> >> >> Microsoft does not perform any testing to determine the effects of >> >> >> disabling IPv6. If IPv6 is disabled on Windows Vista, Windows >> >> >> Server 2008, or later versions, some components will not function. >> >> >> Moreover, applications that you might not think are using >> >> >> IPv6—such as Remote Assistance, HomeGroup, DirectAccess, and >> Windows Mail—could be. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Therefore, Microsoft recommends that you leave IPv6 enabled, even >> >> >> if you do not have an IPv6-enabled network, either native or tunneled. >> >> >> By leaving IPv6 enabled, you do not disable IPv6-only applications >> >> >> and services (for example, HomeGroup in Windows 7 and DirectAccess >> >> >> in Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 are IPv6-only) and your >> >> >> hosts can take advantage of IPv6-enhanced connectivity. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://207.46.16.252/en-us/magazine/2009.07.cableguy.aspx >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 1:05 PM >> >> >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> >> >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I’ve had IPv6 disabled on several Win2K8 servers as well without >> >> >> problem as far as I can tell also. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -sc >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com] >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 3:04 PM >> >> >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> >> >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I've had IPV6 disabled on Vista since forever and have never had >> >> >> any issues talking to my WSUS server. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> More than likely "they" had something else going on and >> >> >> accidentally fixed it at the same time they re-enabled IPV6. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Carl >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com] >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 3:00 PM >> >> >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> >> >> Subject: Re: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I would add Vista and 7 as well but I have not done a lot of >> >> >> testing on that issue. I know some of the products like WSUS were >> >> >> having an issue with Vista clients not having IP6 turned on. I >> >> >> don't remember what the issue was but they had problems connecting >> >> >> reliably to the >> >> server. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Jon >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Free, Bob <r...@pge.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes bad on any 2008 server >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 6:15 AM >> >> >> >> >> >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> >> >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Can you answer this: Is it bad to do it on any 2008 machine, or >> >> >> just a 2008 machine that will host Exchange? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 7:22 AM >> >> >> >> >> >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> >> >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> There are known problems with doing so. And, unfortunately, before >> >> >> you ask me what they are – I’m not allowed to say. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Michael B. Smith >> >> >> >> >> >> Consultant and Exchange MVP >> >> >> >> >> >> http://TheEssentialExchange.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 8:18 AM >> >> >> >> >> >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> >> >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Ok! I’ll try to find it again. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Curious though, as to why it’s such a bad idea… >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 6:15 AM >> >> >> >> >> >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> >> >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Sam – >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> DON’T DO THAT. Dramatic enough? :-) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> And like Carl asked, I’m interested to know where you read it. >> >> >> ‘Cuz I’ll try to get it fixed. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Michael B. Smith >> >> >> >> >> >> Consultant and Exchange MVP >> >> >> >> >> >> http://TheEssentialExchange.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com] >> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:37 PM >> >> >> >> >> >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> >> >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Where'd you read that? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] >> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:33 PM >> >> >> >> >> >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> >> >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> IP6 is disabled on the NIC(s). Something I read to do when >> >> >> introducing >> >> >> Ex2010 into an IPv4 environment. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Free, Bob [mailto:r...@pge.com] >> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 4:20 PM >> >> >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> >> >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> What do you mean by ip4 only? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] >> >> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 8:45 AM >> >> >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> >> >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Having a terrible time getting an RDP session open to my first >> >> >> Srv08 server. Works 50% of the time. Have to fire up the VMware >> >> >> Console to connect. Once I log in through the console, I can then >> >> >> connect to the Srv08. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Firewall is disabled. ip4 only. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ??? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] >> >> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 10:41 AM >> >> >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> >> >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? >> >> >> >> >> >> That’s the same version I have (Win7 ultimate x64). >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Michael B. Smith >> >> >> >> >> >> Consultant and Exchange MVP >> >> >> >> >> >> http://TheEssentialExchange.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] >> >> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 11:35 AM >> >> >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> >> >> Subject: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I have 6.1.7600; thought 7.x was out... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >> >> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >> >> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >> >> >> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ >> >> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >> > >> > >> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ >> > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ >> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
