And this is precisely one of the problems that we have.   The number of
lines they will agree to run is constrained because of the desire to go
converged.  That means when the needs grow (such as backups of each desktop,
which is a planned option for the Macintosh systems on the network), there
will be "fun".

-ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker


On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:35 AM, tony patton <
tony.pat...@quinn-insurance.com> wrote:

> The only problem I have, is unless the phones support gigabit passthru,
> the desktop will only get 100Mb connection to the network.
> Only really becomes an issue when transferring large files, but still an
> issue.
>
> Regards
>
> Tony Patton
> Desktop Operations Cavan
> Ext 8078
> Direct Dial 049 435 2878
> email: tony.pat...@quinn-insurance.com
>
>
>
> From:
> "Glen Johnson" <gjohn...@vhcc.edu>
> To:
> "NT System Admin Issues" <ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>
> Date:
> 12/03/2010 15:33
> Subject:
> RE: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)
>
>
>
> I wouldn?t lobby against it.
> Just set up proper QOS and you should be good to go.
> Unless you?ve got a very good reason not to converge, doing so will make
> your life easier.  Fewer switches and cables to maintain.
>
> From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 10:25 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)
>
> I am not a huge fan of converged networks, although I will acknowledge the
> cost savings in many instances.
>
> I have a situation where we were planning to keep the data traffic and
> voice traffic separate, and all of a sudden (11th hour) that changed.
>
> *If* you were going to lobby against converging a network for 30-50 people
> on a floor that is being built out, what justification would you use?
>
> -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
>
>
>
>
>
> ====================================================================
> http://www.quinn-insurance.com
>
> This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above. The contents
> should not be copied nor disclosed to any other person. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the sender and
> do not necessarily represent those of QUINN-Insurance, unless otherwise
> specifically stated . As internet communications are not secure,
> QUINN-Insurance is not responsible for the contents of this message nor
> responsible for any change made to this message after it was sent by the
> original sender. Although virus scanning is used on all inbound and
> outbound e-mail, we advise you to carry out your own virus check before
> opening any attachment. We cannot accept liability for any damage sustained
> as a result of any software viruses.
>
> ====================================================================
>
> QUINN-Life Direct Limited is regulated by the Financial Regulator.
> QUINN-Insurance Limited is regulated by the Financial Regulator and
> regulated by the Financial Services Authority for the conduct of UK
> business.
>
> ====================================================================
>
> QUINN-Life Direct Limited is registered in Ireland, registration number
> 292374 and is a private company limited by shares.
> QUINN-Insurance Limited is registered in Ireland, registration number
> 240768 and is a private company limited by shares.
> Both companies have their head office at Dublin Road, Cavan, Co. Cavan.
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to