No sign of it where I live (Gainesville Fl) either and like you I'm out on the fringe (I probably live just about as far out from town you can get and still have a G'ville phone #) so it probably won't arrive in this decade.
John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:49 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: National broadband Central Florida/Lakeland. I was originally told, in December 2008, that they were slowing up the roll out due to the economy. Since we are very rural they did not want to spend the money when they were NOT getting the sales they were hoping for. That was per their sales people. Since then it seems that the same people, their sales people, have changed their tune. They were getting upset as it became apparent that it was more where they were rolling out the service that was causing low sales. They pushed out service into areas that did not already have copper in place. Verizon was not rolling out the service into more developed areas or older/established neighborhoods. You can't sell if there are no homes/people to sell to. I have not seen any new work being done in a lot of my area since December 2008. The only work I do see is when the state/county begins to work on the roads and Verizon is very quick to get out and mark where their fiber is. Jon On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Steven M. Caesare <scaes...@caesare.com<mailto:scaes...@caesare.com>> wrote: Where are you at? This is the first I've ever heard of Verizon de-emphasizing FIOS ... -sc From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com<mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com>] Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:26 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: National broadband I only wish FIOS was available for my place. It is across the road from me and Verizon has stopped pushing it out locally. When I have talked to their sales/service people they are not happy either. Sales complains about not getting any sales potentials and service because they are running into problems supporting the aging wire infrastructure as well as they have been trained on working with fiber and not getting to do any work to stay current/keep in practice. Both have had people complain to me about it being like me just a little ways away and not getting it either. Jon On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Steven M. Caesare <scaes...@caesare.com<mailto:scaes...@caesare.com>> wrote: My Verizon FIOS business class service is $160/mo for 15Mbps up/down and 5 static IP's (all usable). -sc > -----Original Message----- > From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonind.com<mailto:npar...@mortonind.com>] > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:10 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: National broadband > > Ha, Regional Cable Co in my little podunk town of 1000 (of when we've had > DSL, Wireless, and Cable services for years) wants $250/month for a > "Business Plan" with static IP's. Same plan I had for a remote warehouse > with Comcast was $80. When I told them that they just said it's what we've > always charged and isn't going to change. I just use DSL and no-ip to redirect > my entire domain to my basement. Email, web, > etc all work great. > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Aldrich > [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com<mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com>] > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 8:59 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: National broadband > > As Steven Caesare said it would be nice to have a static IP at a reasonable > price without a whole bunch of restrictions. Unfortunately Windstream > deems a static IP to be part of a "business" plan and wants me to pay over > $100 / month just for DSL (NOT counting voice services, > etc) for 3 useable static IPs (5 total, IIRC -- 2 of the 5 are for their use - one for > the modem, I think and one for the broadcast.) > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Hornbuckle > [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us<mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us>] > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:51 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: National broadband > > Talking about no-brainers... In my area, DSL used to be the only broadband > option. Eventually, the cable company started offering faster access for the > same price. Do you think the local telco lowered their DSL rates, though? > Nope. I guess they figured folks would keep paying the same price for slower > speeds. > > They recently filed for bankruptcy protection. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Aldrich > [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com<mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com>] > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:49 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: National broadband > > Well, just checked and my ISP has 6 Mbit internet available for the same price > I'm paying for 3 Mbit. No brainer here... I just ordered an upgrade. :-) > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Aldrich > [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com<mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com>] > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:31 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: National broadband > > Geez! I'd be more than happy with 10-15Mbit speed, or even a "true" 6 Mbit. > I don't have that option, AFAIK, with my ISP. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: hg [mailto:hgedr...@myrealbox.com<mailto:hgedr...@myrealbox.com>] > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:03 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: National broadband > > I always wonder the same thing. I even mentioned to two family members > that there was an even lower unpublished tier available that would save then > $20/month and after they changed to it they mentioned there was no > noticeable difference. > > Always on, reasonably low latency and a couple Mb speed works for a lot of > folks. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov<mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov>] > Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 2:23 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: National broadband > > I agree John. My big activities at home are playing MMOs, for the most part. > My Comcast connection at 6-12 Mb is just fine for that. I'm not running a > business out of my home or anything. > > What are people doing at home, for "personal" reasons, that would need > 50 - 100 Mbps down, and 50ish Mbps up? > > >>> John Hornbuckle > >>> <john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us<mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us>> > >>> 3/17/2010 11:08 > >>> AM >>> > I feel like such a neoluddite... I get 10-15Mbps at home via cable modem, and > honestly that's plenty fast for 99% of what I do. > > > > John Hornbuckle > MIS Department > Taylor County School District > www.taylor.k12.fl.us<http://www.taylor.k12.fl.us/> > > > > > > > From: Jay Dale [mailto:jay.d...@3-gig.com<mailto:jay.d...@3-gig.com>] > Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 12:54 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: National broadband > > From what I gathered from this site, they just want to release the capping > the ISP's do on the available bandwidth for the customers, not necessarily > allow Internet for all citizens. ISP's truly have a large amount of bandwidth > available to consumers, yet to control pricing and overhead they cap speeds > and gradually release them on an accounting-time-period-basis. > > I have AT&T at my home, and the highest Mbps down available is 24Mbps, > but compared to a year ago, its twice as fast. So it just happened to be > available now instead of last year? > > If I were to pay $65/month for 100Mbps/50Mbps, I would gladly do it. So > long as it's available. Knowing it's available yet being restricted is what is > irritating. > > > Jay Dale > I.T. Manager, 3GiG > Mobile: 713.299.2541 > Email: > jay.d...@3-gig.com<mailto:jay.d...@3-gig.com><mailto:kandy.luk...@3-gig.com<mailto:kandy.luk...@3-gig.com>> > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain > confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended > recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, > or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the > intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended > recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of > this message. > > > From: Jacob [mailto:ja...@excaliburfilms.com<mailto:ja...@excaliburfilms.com>] > Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 10:40 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: National broadband > > I could run a cable up to you from our OC3... ;-) > > From: Jeff Johnson > [mailto:jjohn...@hydraflowusa.com<mailto:jjohn...@hydraflowusa.com>] > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 11:51 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: National broadband > > Though I would love to see the US and all broadband providers give us better > services, my concern is at what cost? > > If I look at my home service, 24 Mbps down and 1.5 up, is running $65. > That is pretty cheap, but still a LONG way from 100/50 Mbps. I am really > curious what the government feels is "affordable access"? It would seem > that only businesses would pay more than $100/month for service, but a > business would require some type of SLA. At my office, I COULD get 100 > Mbps service, but have no idea what the price would be. > Considering 3 Mbps service is costing me $530 for a business line, I would not > even want to consider the price. > > > Jeff Johnson > Systems Administrator > 714-773-2600 Office > 714-773-6351 Fax > [cid:image001.jpg@01CAC5DB.5FEFEF30]<mailto:[cid:image001.jpg@01CAC5DB.5FEFEF30]> > > From: David Lum [mailto:david....@nwea.org<mailto:david....@nwea.org>] > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 11:39 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: National broadband > > Thoughts, comments? > > http://www.broadband.gov/ > David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER > NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION > (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications > to or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the public > and the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to > public disclosure. > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > ---- Content & Policy Scan by M+ Guardian ---- Millions of safe & clean > messages delivered daily > > > > > ---AV & Spam Filtering by M+Guardian - Risk Free Email (TM)--- > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > > > NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications > to or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the public > and the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to > public disclosure. > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ________________________________ CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
