"Hey, I'm in it for the money."
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 3:31 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Admin rights, UAC, etc. (was: WTF? Fake AV) "I don't know where you get your delusions, laser brain." On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Jonathan Link <jonathan.l...@gmail.com> wrote: "Laugh it up, fuzball." On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Ben Scott <mailvor...@gmail.com> wrote: On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Ziots, Edward <ezi...@lifespan.org> wrote: > Define "Properly Secured" because what is secured from one users prospective > is totally different than what another user thinks ... "Properly secured" would mean the accounts used for day-to-day operations do not have permission to modify the system. Principle of least privilege. A well-known and widely-recommended best practice since roughly the 1960s. As I went on to detail in my message. > ... no ... computer for that matter can be 100% protected. I never claimed otherwise. I wrote "properly secured", not "perfectly secured". Did reading comprehension just drop sharply or something? What is it about this topic that makes people unable to follow a line of reasoning? It's like attack of the strawmen. What next, "Macs are more secure because Chewbacca is a Wookie"? -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
