Just wait until they get to middle school or high school and you want to keep track of them. I do the pickup for my teenage daughter who is in high school and do the followups when she is going some place the wife and I don't know about. Maybe protective but she attracts way too many boys/men with her looks.
Jon On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Jonathan Link <jonathan.l...@gmail.com>wrote: > If anyone tells you it (the time sink thing) gets better they're lying. > My daughter consumes more of my time now than when she was your son's age. > Wouldn't change a thing, though. Luckily I do the day-care dropoff and she > has the pickup, so I can work late when necessary... > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Kurt Buff <kurt.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Heh. >> >> If only I had the time... >> >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 13:07, Chris Blair <chris_bl...@identisys.com> >> wrote: >> > Yes, cert. >> > >> > I had the same attitude, but I am actually enjoying it and learning a >> lot. >> > >> > Each to their own. >> > >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] >> > Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 3:02 PM >> > To: NT System Admin Issues >> > Subject: Re: Server Core >> > >> > Test? You mean certification? >> > >> > Certs are for the weak. I overcame that need in 1995. >> > >> > Kurt >> > >> > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:57, Chris Blair <chris_bl...@identisys.com> >> wrote: >> >> They sure push Server Core hard in the 70-640 test. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] >> >> Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 2:56 PM >> >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> >> Subject: Re: Server Core >> >> >> >> Interesting, and good to know. Still, the more they can support on >> >> core, the better, IMHO. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:48, Free, Bob <r...@pge.com> wrote: >> >>> Remember the purpose of core was not to be an application platform but >> to >> >>> “provide a minimal environment for running specific server roles that >> >>> reduces the maintenance and management requirements and the attack >> surface >> >>> for those server roles.” >> >>> >> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/r2-compare-core-installation.aspx >> >>> >> >>> Caveat to the snippet below- R2 now supports 11 roles rather than the >> >>> original 9 and we also have .NET now but the underlying message is the >> same- >> >>> >> >>> From http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd184076.aspx >> >>> >> >>> Consider again the nine server roles you can install on Server Core: >> >>> >> >>> AD DS >> >>> AD LDS >> >>> DNS >> >>> DHCP >> >>> File Services >> >>> Print Services >> >>> Streaming Media Services >> >>> Web Server (IIS) >> >>> Hyper-V >> >>> >> >>> This list of roles should immediately suggest some possible usage >> scenarios >> >>> for Server Core within your organization. Here are some ways that you >> could >> >>> use Server Core to make your network more secure, more reliable, >> easier to >> >>> manage, and easier to maintain: >> >>> >> >>> Infrastructure servers. Domain controllers, DHCP servers, and DNS >> servers >> >>> are the backbone of your network. Running these roles on Server Core >> can >> >>> strengthen this backbone in every way. >> >>> Branch office servers. Because Server Core installations are more >> secure and >> >>> require fewer software updates than Full installations, they are ideal >> for >> >>> use in remote locations, such as branch offices where you have few (or >> no) >> >>> information technology (IT) staff and less physical security than at >> your >> >>> head office location. For example, you might deploy a Server Core >> >>> installation as a read-only domain controller with BitLocker for added >> >>> security at a branch office. >> >>> Server consolidation and testing. Because Hyper-V is a supported role >> on >> >>> Server Core, you can use Server Core to consolidate multiple servers >> onto a >> >>> single system while still keeping them isolated. This can help lower >> your >> >>> TCO by reducing your hardware requirements and your power, cooling, >> and >> >>> management costs. Server Core running Hyper-V also provides a >> convenient >> >>> environment for deployment testing. >> >>> Extending hardware life. Because Server Core has lower disk and memory >> >>> requirements than Full installations, you may be able to get more life >> out >> >>> of old systems. For example, when you need to upgrade your e-mail or >> >>> database servers, those boxes could be moved down the line to become >> network >> >>> infrastructure servers running Server Core. >> >>> >> >>> Non-Usage Scenarios >> >>> >> >>> What shouldn't you use Server Core for? The main thing to understand >> is that >> >>> Server Core is intended to run only the nine server roles listed >> previously. >> >>> Nothing else. In other words, Server Core can't be used as a platform >> for >> >>> running server applications such as Exchange Server, Microsoft SQL >> Server, >> >>> or third-party server applications like SAP. You also can't use it for >> >>> running Microsoft Office System applications or Microsoft Office >> SharePoint >> >>> Server. And you can't (or at least shouldn't) use it to run custom >> >>> applications you've developed in-house. In short, Server Core is not >> an >> >>> application hosting platform. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >> >>> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] >> >>> Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 11:31 AM >> >>> To: NT System Admin Issues >> >>> Subject: Re: Server Core >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Uh, >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> So what needs a GUI on top? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:22, Michael B. Smith <mich...@smithcons.com >> > >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Server core is good for anything that doesn’t need a gui on top. >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> Regards, >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> Michael B. Smith >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> Consultant and Exchange MVP >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> http://TheEssentialExchange.com <http://theessentialexchange.com/> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> From: David Lum [mailto:david....@nwea.org] >> >>> >> >>>> Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 2:19 PM >> >>> >> >>>> To: NT System Admin Issues >> >>> >> >>>> Subject: Server Core >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> Would I be correct in telling my fellow SE’s that Server Core typical >> uses >> >>> >> >>>> are remote DC (along with RODC), hyper-V hosts and web servers? >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER >> >>> >> >>>> NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION >> >>> >> >>>> (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >> >>> >> >>> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >> >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >> >> >> >> >> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >> >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >> > >> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >> > >> > >> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >> >> > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
