And what, exactly, made Windows 2000 Workstation more of a "server" O/S?
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) <http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker> *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:34 PM, John Aldrich <jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com>wrote: > Strictly NT. Windows 2000 was much more “user friendly” but was, IMO, > more of a “server” O/S, even W2K Workstation. > > > > [image: John-Aldrich][image: Perception_2] > > > > *From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 08, 2010 12:23 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Mac and Windows mix > > > > Funny, it was my user OS since pre-beta. > > > > Are you speaking of the NT “family”, or strictly the versions of the same > codebase named “NT”? > > > > -sc > > > > *From:* John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 08, 2010 10:29 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Mac and Windows mix > > > > True… but NT was not a “user” operating system. J > > > > [image: John-Aldrich][image: Perception_2] > > > > *From:* Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 08, 2010 10:27 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Mac and Windows mix > > > > This is only one, tiny, aspect of implementing a security model (reading > Windows Internals by Russinovich/Solomon is highly recommended). > > > > That said, Windows NT has had the same model since the first released > version (v3.1 back in 1993) > > > > Cheers > > Ken > > > > *From:* John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, 8 September 2010 10:13 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Mac and Windows mix > > > > Basically, that users are not admins and that everything runs in > “userspace” unless specifically run as an admin, including installation of > software. > > > > [image: John-Aldrich][image: Perception_2] > > > > *From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 08, 2010 8:49 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Mac and Windows mix > > > > What do you understand that model to be? > > > > -sc > > > > *From:* John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 07, 2010 3:15 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Mac and Windows mix > > > > Not to start a flame war or anything, but I was under the impression that > Mac OS/X was significantly **more* *secure than a comparable Windows > machine, due to the *nix security model? Asking for information here, trying > to learn, not trying to start a Mac Vs. Windows thread (there are enough of > those, that I don’t need to start one! <G>) > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
<<image002.jpg>>
<<image001.jpg>>
