The issue with local storage on VMware is that it makes Vmotion
problematic. J

The general recommendation is to present shared storage to your ESX
hosts (iSCSI, FC, NFS) and create VMFS volumes for your guests. As far
as they know it's local storage then.

 

DAMIEN SOLODOW

Systems Engineer

317.447.6033 (office)

317.217.6851 (fax)

HARRISON COLLEGE

 

From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 11:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: MS iSCSI initiators in VM guests

 

It is posible, but what we've discovered is that if you have a SAN
connectivity issue you've compilicated your life.  We had a long term
performance issue and boot to SAN would be problematic.  Local storage
is cheap cheap cheap.  Frankly if I could I would have our Exchange in
direct attached storage but it is not up to me, we must spend way more
because it says 'SAN'.

 

Steven Peck

http://www.blkmtn.org

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Ken Schaefer <k...@adopenstatic.com>
wrote:

Boot from SAN is definitely possible within VMWare

 

Cheers

Ken

 

From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, 5 April 2011 10:01 PM


To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS iSCSI initiators in VM guests

 

Boot from iSCSI SAN is possible:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee619733(WS.10).aspx. There
are some specific configuration requirements.

 

There's a boot version of the initiator for Win2K3 as well. 

 

I've seen reports of it working within VMWare.

 

-sc

 

From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 9:49 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS iSCSI initiators in VM guests

 

Harry,

It would be impossible to use the guest-based initiator like the MS
software initiator or the EQL Hit kit to connect the OS drive, because,
as I understand it, the software initiator doesn't load until the OS
boots.

Any other drives can be connected via the MS software initiator quite
well (or the EQL hit kit).

Vmware definitely supports running the msiSCSI initiator inside a guest
that is hosted in an ESX server connected via the VM initiators to a
VMFS store.

the answer to your second question about connecting data drives (sql
data/logs, exchange stores) via the host initiator from a VMFS store
breaks the EQL technology because the EQL stuff works on the EQL hit kit
extensions to work.

 

what was the best option between attaching all drives as VMFS from the
host initiator, or attaching the data drives via guest-based initiator
using the MS or EQL initiators is the subject of my original post, and
the consensus so far from all the replies has been a resounding "it
depends..."  LOL

 

What other posters have suggested, and what the guys in my shop decided,
was to test both ways using a solid tool to measure the performance of
the disk subsystem, like IOMeter, perfmon, or in my case, some of the
Longitude Monitoring system's tools.

________________________________

From: Harry Singh [hbo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 3:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: MS iSCSI initiators in VM guests

Those using the guest iSCSI initatior inside VM guests, are you using
that to connect all the drives? OS, Data, logs, DBs ? I don't have the
specific reference, but I always thought VMware didn't off support
running the MS iSCSI initiator inside a guest windows server VM whose
host connects to a VMFS datastore via iSCSI. 

 

Those using EQL's -- using VMware's native iSCSI initiator to create
disk breaks the app-aware snapshot feature? This is interesting since my
existing archeticture, as a result of a reduced feature-set SAN, has
always been to create VMFS datastores for new disks. Specifically for
exchange 2010 and SQL.

 

H

 

 

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Kim Longenbaugh
<k...@colonialsavings.com> wrote:

Thanks, I saw that, and just got the slide deck today.  Like you and
others have pointed out, there's definitely pros and cons for either
choice.

 

From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonind.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 12:25 PM


To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS iSCSI initiators in VM guests

 

Something else you made me remember.  If you plan to do MPIO at the Host
level then your VMFS disks will be able to take advantage of that.  EQ
just had a good webex about MPIO at the host level vs. guest level a
couple weeks ago, below is the recording.

 

https://dellenterprise.webex.com/ec0605l/eventcenter/recording/recordAct
ion.do?theAction=poprecord&actname=%2Feventcenter%2Fframe%2Fg.do&apiname
=lsr.php&renewticket=0&renewticket=0&actappname=ec0605l&entappname=url01
07l&needFilter=false&&isurlact=true&entactname=%2FnbrRecordingURL.do&rID
=42187702&rKey=bed3095e1947d127&recordID=42187702&rnd=1623196772&siteurl
=dellenterprise&SP=EC&AT=pb&format=short

 

________________________________

From: Damien Solodow [mailto:damien.solo...@harrison.edu] 
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 12:07 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS iSCSI initiators in VM guests

File Servers are a bit questionable, but for SQL/Exchange it depends on
if you want to use the features of the ASMME for it. 

If you plan to present any VMFS from the ESX hosts though, definitely
install the ESX DSM.

If you do VMFS for SQL/Exchange, make sure the virtual SCSI adaptor is
the paravirtualized one as it can make a big difference on boxes with
heavy IO requirements. 

 

DAMIEN SOLODOW

Systems Engineer

317.447.6033 (office)

317.217.6851 (fax)

HARRISON COLLEGE

 

From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 1:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS iSCSI initiators in VM guests

 

There will be some of each type that you mentioned.  File services, SQL
2005/2008, Exchange 2010.  I agree that there's some advantages to be
gained using the EQL HIT kits, both in the guest and the ESX servers.

 

From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonind.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 11:34 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS iSCSI initiators in VM guests

 

We use option two here, there are a lot of very good EQ/Dell best
practice white papers dealing with this exact topic.  You didn't say
what's going to be running on your servers.  File, SQL, Exchange, etc.
But if you don't do iSCSI inside the guest you lose all capability to
make use of the integrated EQ tools for snapping DB's etc.  The folks
that say to use VMFS partitions for everything are probably using SAN's
that don't have the capabilities your EQ's do.  We have multiple SQL
servers with multiple vNics using EQ's iSCSI MPIO overlay inside the
guest and it works great.  Doing the same thing with my virtualized file
server and soon Exchange 2010.

 

________________________________

From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 10:46 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: MS iSCSI initiators in VM guests

I considered using an "OT" tag, but decided this is not OT for the list.

 

We're having an often heated debate on how to attach data drives in
Win2003/Win2008 guests in our new VM 4.1 environment.  

 

We use Dell Equallogic iSCSI attached SAN arrays.

 

Some folks say it's best to attach all the drives, whether it's an OS
volume (C:\) or data drives, through the Vmware ESX iSCSI initiators,
which would force us to use VMFS partitions (having decided again RDMs
or NFS partitions).

 

There's also a group that says that only the c:\ drive should be
attached using the Vmware ESX iSCSI initiators, and the guests should be
attached with guest-based initiators, either the MS one, or the
Equallogic-furnished initiator with its own specific DSM.

 

Who uses which method, and what's your pros and cons for each?

 

Thanks

Kim

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to