OSX. That's essentially what we've been doing (copying the files) but not with shell scripts. I was just wondering if there was any wisdom (or even ability) to keep all that stuff on a central server so that everybody was always looking at the same thing. In other words I guess, instead of the .nuke dir living locally it was on a central server. Not a good idea?
On Feb 25, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Deke Kincaid wrote: > Which OS? You don't need the nuke installer, just copy the files to > the right locations on all machines. Linux/osx can easily do this > with simple shell scripts. Also osx server and windows server have > tools to automate this. > > -deke > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 16:26, Gary Jaeger <[email protected]> wrote: >> What's the best way to keep nuke installs consistent between workstations? >> >> We're a small shop and we've always done it seat of the pants (which is >> manageable given our size) but I have a feeling there is A Better Way. >> >> . . . . . . . . . . . . >> Gary Jaeger // Core Studio >> 86 Graham Street, Suite 120 >> San Francisco, CA 94129 >> 415 543 8140 >> http://corestudio.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users . . . . . . . . . . . . Gary Jaeger // Core Studio 86 Graham Street, Suite 120 San Francisco, CA 94129 415 543 8140 http://corestudio.com _______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected] http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
