Oooh - sorry - i see - misunderstood

thanks for pointing out

Interesting ill check that ACES one out... :)


Neil Scholes

+44(0) 7977 456 197
www.uvfilms.co.uk






On 31 Aug 2012, at 15:02, Schneider, Abraham wrote:

> Hm, if you've got 'vd10' in your OCIO node, you can't be using the ACES 
> config, because vd10 does not exist in the aces config. 'vd10' exists in the 
> 'spi-vfx' config, but that doesn't use the ACES colorspace. For ACES you have 
> to use the iff config or the aces config from www.opencolorio.org. 
> 
>> Taking an sRGB and converting to linear is a just an inverted  gamma thing 
>> right?
> 
> sRGB is a little bit more than gamma, but yes, it's something like this. But 
> then your'e images are in a linear colorspace which has the same RGB 
> chromaticities than sRGB, but ACES has different chromaticities. So Nuke 
> 'linear' is not the same as ACES linear, at least to my understanding.
> 
> Abraham
> 
> 
> Am 31.08.2012 um 16:01 schrieb Neil Scholes:
> 
>> Really?  Im not sure i follow sorry.
>> 
>> Taking an sRGB and converting to linear is a just an inverted  gamma thing 
>> right?
>> 
>> once in linear you can do whatever you want  - and then finally view it as 
>> filmsRGB is you so require...
>> 
>> 
>> ive got 2 instances of nuke running - one in standard nuke sRGB lut and the 
>> other with an ACES set up - and there is no difference goign from sRGB to 
>> linear and back again.
>> 
>> 
>> in the aces set up i have an OCIO colorspace node with input set to vd10, 
>> output to linear - bringing me to linear space - then another OCIO 
>> colorspace node : input linear out put vd10 - taking me back to sRGB
>> 
>> 
>> i have noticed that Log toLin in aces is brighter - i prefer actually.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Neil Scholes
>> 
>> +44(0) 7977 456 197
>> www.uvfilms.co.uk
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 31 Aug 2012, at 14:26, Schneider, Abraham wrote:
>> 
>>> Hm, but in this way, you're not working in ACES colorspace at all!, because 
>>> the standard colorspace node transforms from sRGB to Nuke linear, which has 
>>> different chromaticities and maybe whitepoint than the ACES colorspace? But 
>>> how do you combine this sRGB-to-Nuke-linear footage with ACES encoded other 
>>> footage? 
>>> 
>>> Abraham
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Am 31.08.2012 um 15:28 schrieb Neil Scholes:
>>> 
>>>> Thats what i do - reading in sRGB sequence as linear 
>>>> 
>>>> plonk down a standard colorspace node setting input to sRGB output to 
>>>> Linear
>>>> 
>>>> do any comp work / grading
>>>> 
>>>> put down a final colorspace node setting input to Linear - output to sRGB
>>>> 
>>>> set the display LUT to RAW(sRGB) - 
>>>> 
>>>> (or use a OCIO display node with input color space set to srgb8, display 
>>>> device sRGB and view transform Raw.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Neil Scholes
>>>> 
>>>> +44(0) 7977 456 197
>>>> www.uvfilms.co.uk
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 31 Aug 2012, at 13:47, Schneider, Abraham wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> And an additional question:
>>>>> 
>>>>> is there a way to go from the old style Nuke linear colorspace to the 
>>>>> ACES colorspace? Both linear of course, but at least the RGB 
>>>>> chromaticities are different, whitepoint as well? 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Of course, it would only be possible to go from Nuke linear to ACES 
>>>>> without a loss, not the other way around because of the different gammut.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks, Abraham
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Am 31.08.2012 um 11:13 schrieb Schneider, Abraham:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi there!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I just played around with the OCIO nodes/modes in Nuke 6.3v8. I also had 
>>>>>> a look at the ACES workflow/config from the opencolorIO.org website. 
>>>>>> I've added this 'aces' config to Nuke by adding the config.ocio as the 
>>>>>> custom config.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Seems to work fine so far. But there is one thing in this whole 
>>>>>> setup/config that I doesn't really get: how do I use sRGB/rec709/video 
>>>>>> footage (stills and/or movies) in a ACES environment? Normally I'd 
>>>>>> assume to switch the Read node to raw and/or linear (because the Read 
>>>>>> doesn't support OCIO yet), add a OCIOColorSpace, set IN to something 
>>>>>> like sRGB/rec709/etc. and the OUT to aces, to convert the image to the 
>>>>>> ACES colorspace. But there is no IN setting for sRGB/rech709/etc.! I can 
>>>>>> convert ARRI logC, analog film scans (cineon coded), sLog, etc., but not 
>>>>>> 'video' or other display referred encoded material (neither in the iff 
>>>>>> config coming by default with Nuke nor in the aces config from 
>>>>>> opencolorio.org). So how am I supposed to use still images, video stock 
>>>>>> footage, etc. in an ACES workflow in Nuke?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Only way I tried it at the moment was to switch the Read to "sRGB" (or 
>>>>>> rec709 or gamma 2.2 etc.), add a normal Colorspace after the read that 
>>>>>> converts from linear to AlexaV3LogC and add a OCIOColorSpace with IN = 
>>>>>> 'logc' and OUT = 'aces'. Seems to work, but doesn't seem to be a clever 
>>>>>> way.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Do I miss something or is this just not supported at the moment in this 
>>>>>> ACES config/workflow? Using the 'spi-vfx' config in comparison, there is 
>>>>>> the option to set the IN to 'vd8' or 'vd10' or something like that. But 
>>>>>> 'spi-vfx' is not using the ACES colorspace, right?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Abraham
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Abraham Schneider
>>>>>> Head of VFX pipeline / VFX Supervisor
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ARRI Film & TV Services GmbH
>>>>>> Tuerkenstr. 89
>>>>>> D-80799 Muenchen / Germany
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Phone +49 89 3809-1269
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> EMail [email protected]
>>>>>> www.arri.de/filmtv
>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ARRI Film & TV Services GmbH
>>>>>> Sitz: München Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
>>>>>> Handelsregisternummer: HRB 69396
>>>>>> Geschäftsführer: Franz Kraus, Dr. Martin Prillmann, Josef Reidinger
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> 

_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to