60000000000000 AE plug ins and real type tools. Timeline that is better
suited for motion graphics. Full Adobe integration for graphic elements.
That being said it all depends on what the motion graphics are. In
some cases I would go to Nuke before AE
Randy S. Little
http://www.rslittle.com <http://reel.rslittle.com>
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2325729/
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:22 AM, emersontg <
[email protected]> wrote:
> **
> Is it possible to use Nuke for motion graphics instead After Effects? I
> mean, may I do anything (particles, animated text etc) in Nuke that I do in
> After effects? or Nuke is for composition only...Anyone can explain the
> main diferences?
> thanks in advance
> emerson
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
