Hey guys... So I am still dealing with issue with my Match move setup, more in terms of the MM itself over anything else.
But, I'm trying to think of shortcuts with the problem. It is a head that I am match moving, and I would prefer to stay out of maya. And due to the angle of it, all the MM's I was getting from 3D I've had to throw away. So I am rebuilding this in Nuke now. I have geo and a camera and all of that. What I am trying to figure out is if there is a way to leverage each space (2d, and 3D) to help knock out this task more effectivly. I've used a points to 3d to set a better anchor point for the head object in the 3d space. and have re-st my .obj there and set it's pivot to the center of that point. They I was adding a secondary transformGeo node to hand MM the head into position. But what I was thinking is that I can track a feature on that object in 2D space that could help with at least 30% of the MM to take out all the little jitter and things that will be hard for me to nail. Can I use that 2D point track to affect the 3D transformGeo node? Obviously the values are in two completely different worlds, but would there be a way to use the 2D transform data combined with the camera data to generate a value that was applicable to the 3D transformGeo node? I'm working on an undistorted plate so 90% of the lens issues should be removed from this equation. Thoughts? I was thinking of having a reconcile3d run on every 2d point and generate a transform node based on that. But would that work? Thanks guys! Justin -- Justin Ball VFX VFX Supervisor, Comp, Effects, Pipeline and more... jus...@justinballvfx.com 818.384.0923
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
