updates to existing tools no longer need to be approved, so they should show up immediately

On 30/01/14 02:21, theodor groeneboom wrote:
Thats great to hear! I'm just waiting for Frank to approve the latest upload.

Sprut on.


On 29 January 2014 13:19, Martin Constable <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hi Theo

    The Bug is still there in the copy from Nukepedia. However, this
    is prob because the copy on the server has not refreshed (or
    something).

    The copy I edited myself is behaving well and getting sweeeeet
    results.

    martin


    On 29 Jan, 2014, at 8:43 PM, theodor groeneboom
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    > Martin, Ari & Ron, I've re-uploaded the file on Nukepedia. Let
    me know if this one works, as I havn't seen this bug before.
    >
    >
    > On 29 January 2014 12:25, theodor groeneboom
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    > Hi Ron, it seems Martin discovered this bug first. I've forgot
    to round a float value to an int. Try replacing line 24 in the
    executeSim python script with "task.setProgress(int(progress))".
    > I'll update the nukepedia file over lunch to include this.
    >
    >
    > On 29 January 2014 12:21, Ron Ganbar <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    > Indeed, wonderful stuff Theo. Well done.
    > I tried your examples and didn't get much joy, though.
    > Everything is fine until I read the Solver, and the resolution
    after that turns to 256x256. I opened up the Group and it seemed
    to me the problem was with the cache. I placed a new path for the
    cache and hit the cache button and got the attached error.
    >
    > Anything you can help here?
    >
    > Thanks
    > R
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Ron Ganbar
    > email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    > tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 <tel:%2B44%20%280%297968%20007%20309> [UK]
    > +972 (0)54 255 9765 <tel:%2B972%20%280%2954%20255%209765> [Israel]
    > url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/
    >
    >
    > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Ari Rubenstein
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    > Theodor
    >
    > This is excellent, thank you for your efforts. I've wanted a 2d
    fluid sim in nuke for awhile, I can think of several uses.
    >
    > Going to try it out shortly, I'll provide feedback.
    >
    > Ari
    > Blue Sky
    >
    >
    > Sent from my iPhone
    >
    > On Jan 29, 2014, at 4:33 AM, theodor groeneboom
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    >
    >> Hi Nuke-list,
    >>
    >>
    >> I spent some time earlier this year putting together a 2d fluid
    sim "framework" using gizmos. I've used it on a few shows and
    personal work and it seems to be fairly stable and lots of fun to use.
    >>
    >> <sprut_banner.jpg>
    >>
    >> I've abstracted Jos Stam's 1999 Siggraph paper "Stable Fluids"
    into Nuke's own nodes, making it a gizmo-centric fluid simulator.
    Its very easy to extend and learn from looking at the internals,
    something I hope the Nuke community will benefit from.
    >>
    >> <image12.gif><image00.gif>
    >>
    >> There's currently three nodes, SprutEmitter, SprutSolver and a
    diagnostics tool SprutInspect.
    >> I hope by releasing it to the public, other Nuke artists will
    pick it up and contribute to the system, and keep on sharing it.
    >>
    >> You can find the gizmos, docs and example scripts here :
    >>
    >>
    >> Its compatible with all three platforms, and most versions of
    Nuke. No install requirements, just copy and paste the nodes
    around like usual.
    >>
    >> I also want to give a shout out to Andre Hitsøy, Lucien Fostier
    & Michael Ralla for contributions and greideas!
    >>
    >> -theo
    >>
    >> www.euqahuba.com <http://www.euqahuba.com>
    >>
    >> _______________________________________________
    >> Nuke-users mailing list
    >> [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>,
    http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
    >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Nuke-users mailing list
    > [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>,
    http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
    > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
    >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Nuke-users mailing list
    > [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>,
    http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
    > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
    >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Nuke-users mailing list
    > [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>,
    http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
    > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

    _______________________________________________
    Nuke-users mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>,
    http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
    http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users




_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to