We just had similar issue, with artifacts in random frames using ZDefocus. Very 
hard to debug.
In our case the artifacts were triggered by large depth differences and 
appeared in same place. Reducing depth difference in these places removed 
artifacts completely.
Hope it helps.
Lev

________________________________
From: Doug Wilkinson [d...@buck.tv]
Sent: 06 February 2014 22:37
To: Nuke user discussion
Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] ZDefocus buggy?

Yea i've noticed this with zdefocus. i don't think that clamping fixed this 
issue.


On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Frank Rueter 
<fr...@beingfrank.info<mailto:fr...@beingfrank.info>> wrote:
I have had this with an earlier version of ZDefocus but not recently. Checking 
for NaNs is definitely a good idea.



On 05/02/14 15:27, Ryan O'Phelan wrote:

Any chance there are NANs in the renders?
Mental Ray?

R

On Feb 4, 2014 10:23 AM, "Falko Paeper" 
<falko.pae...@filmakademie.de<mailto:falko.pae...@filmakademie.de>> wrote:
Hi Nukers,

has anyone of you guys ever got wierd artifacts (infinite color values) or 
unstable comps using ZDefocus?

It happened twice now in two different companies with two different projects 
and two different version of nuke (NukeX 7.0v6 & NUKEX 7.0v9).

It appears on random frames (in a sequence of 300 frames on 2 or 3) and (I 
think) only when the focus plane is animated and/or when I use multiple 
ZDefocus Nodes in the same comp. Also the comp gets highly unstable and crashes 
by only clicking on the ZDefocus node. In both cases the depth pass was 
rendered with sitoa to EXR with the depth info stored in Alpha but I doubt 
thats part of the issue since I checked the data and its all normal (no broken 
pixels or unusual values).

The thing is, I can get rid of the issue by either disable "automatic layer 
spacing" or shuffle the depthpass into another channel then "depth"? But that 
only helps for one frame and it then will certainly appaers on a another random 
frame. At least I can somehow fix it but its still pretty annoying. Anyone with 
similar experiences or work arounds?

cheers

Falko

__________________________________________________
Falko Paeper

falko.pae...@filmakademie.de<mailto:falko.pae...@filmakademie.de>
Skype: fpaeper
Karlsplatz 1 | 71638-Ludwigsburg | Germany

__________________________________________________
Falko Paeper

Tel. 0173 74 84 449
falko.pae...@filmakademie.de<mailto:falko.pae...@filmakademie.de> | 
falko-pae...@web.de<mailto:falko-pae...@web.de>
Skype: fpaeper
Karlsplatz 1 | 71638-Ludwigsburg

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk<mailto:Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk>,
 http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users



_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk<mailto:Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk>,
 http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users


_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk<mailto:Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk>,
 http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to