Just a note about aces in nuke vs resolve. As of resolve 9 used the same version as nuke 7&8 (v.1). As of resolve 10 they are using aces .22(I think), nuke is still using .1.
To confuse even more, v .7 just came out. -deke On Thursday, March 6, 2014, Frank Rueter <[email protected]> wrote: > I had tried that but that doesn't even get close. I'm guessing if Resolve > was set up with ACES it might be a promising, but since the colourist > doesn't want to go there, I can't even try to do the "right" thing. > > > On 3/7/14, 10:15 AM, Alex Fry wrote: > > I'd be inclined to try aces-->slog using an OCIOcolorspace node as a > starting point. > > On 7 Mar 2014, at 8:01 am, Frank Rueter <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since I cannot get Resolve to match the ACES linear files from > RawViewer to the original mxf files (and the colourist refuses to set up > Resolve with ACES), my workflow now seems to become the following (not that > I am a fan, but it might have to do): > > -export a bunch of frames from the film (including a test chart) from > Resolve as log dpx > -export the same frames as ACES linear from RawViewer > -in Nuke, create a sequence for each (AppendClip or Switch node with > expression) > -use those two clips as inputs to the MatcGrade > -set a key frames on each frame, analyze and export a 3d lut. > > The resulting lut is applied to the output in Nuke just before rendering > log dpx files for final grading in Resolve. > This way I'm getting very close to making the VFX plates match the > original mxf raw files. It's not perfect, but probably good enough in my > case. > > Needless to say that I'd prefer a less empirical way, but this seems to be > the only workable solution so far. > > > Cheers and thanks again for all your help Alex! > frank > > > On 3/7/14, 6:22 AM, Alex Fry wrote: > > They would just be updating/improving their IDT. > > I've tried the current one, and it work's fundamentally as expected. > But like any sort of calibration exercise, you can always get closer to > the target with more time. > > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Randy Little <[email protected]>wrote: > > I just saw that at NAB Sony is releasing an update to there ACES > implementation as well as s-log3 for the f65. So Maybe they had something > that wasn't quit right with their ACES implementation? > > Randy S. Little > http://www.rslittle.com/ > http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2325729/ > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Alex Fry <[email protected]> wrote: > > The ACES values are scene linear. > > The difference with scene linear files you would have previously been > working with, is that whilst they would have been scene linear in their > intensity, but their primaries are effectively display referred (either > Rec709 primaries or P3). Because their gamut and whitepoint already match > your display device a simple 1D transform > > -- -- Deke Kincaid Creative Specialist The Foundry Skype: dekekincaid Tel: (310) 399 4555 - Mobile: (310) 883 4313 Web: www.thefoundry.co.uk Email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
