Of course I'd too like to keep the mailing list, but I do respect some benefits of forum... Please correct me if i'm wrong :
-when one has an issue and mostly tries to google the same (which possibly could already be a discussed topic) having it accessible on a forum could be much faster and without having to start a new query of the same topic everytime similar question arises. -Forum like stackoverflow would be ideal as we could rate the relevant solve which again makes it faster for the seeker and does not have to go through the whole discussion to anticipate/get the actual solve. Seekers will always benefit from forums and contributors would love to have the ease of mailing list. So IMHO the weight is towards contributors and may be foundry could have a system which creates a database out of mailing list and +1(exactly as everyone of us are doing here but there's no SUM) helps rating the correct solve within the mailing list. May be a little complicated but still not impossible. Cheers, Sudeepto ________________________________ From: adam jones [adam....@mac.com] Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 1:27 AM To: Nuke user discussion Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] The forums are moving +1 I dont know if this is permissible or not but as in the case with the 3ds max and Maya private mailing lists cannot some one start an alternative nuke mailing list of there own volition and to reduce the level of noise make it via invite. On 05/02/2015, at 11:04 PM, Harrison Ly <contac...@harrisonly.co.uk<mailto:contac...@harrisonly.co.uk>> wrote: +1 I am also voicing out to keep the mailing list. Great to see all the topics in one place showing just the headlines rather than clicking though different things. That's the new setup or the old forum? Yes, that behavior is useless, like the old forum. I was hoping the new 'community' setup would behave more like a support ticket with Tweak - I send a ticket (email support or go to the web interface) and I get a mail. I can reply with the mail or the web, except in this case it would be public. That's all I want out of it. I could then search my mail or the web interface. Anything more than that wastes my time and makes it less useful. If the new 'community' doesn't behave that way, I'm ready to sign onto the google version. The only value a forum (or the new setup) has for me is the ability to search through the history from before I signed on. Whatever they do, I hope the list archives get transferred. JRAB On 2/5/15 12:30 AM, Randy Little wrote: You only get a response if you have the time to go dig through a forum in the first place. The forum doesn't just email me through some AI that knows what it thinks I want to read. On Feb 4, 2015 2:39 PM, "John RA Benson" <j...@illum-mg.fr<mailto:j...@illum-mg.fr>> wrote: Hey all - does it really matter if: we get the email we reply to the email and everyone gets it. the 'community' gets the email if you reply online in the 'community' you get the email. sort of like the list with the benefit of the online 'community' and the list being able to talk to each other, unlike how the forum worked when I'd send something online and it never ended up on the list so there were never any replies. The forum sucked, so it's good they are changing it. I don't know what this new 'community' setup is yet (too tired to look at it at the moment), but if it allows me to keep my inbox folders with nuke-python and nuke-users and still get and reply to the posts, I'm not going to see a difference and won't care. That questions and replies end up online and reply-able from online would be a bonus. But hey - if everyone here jumps ship it's not going to be a 'community' at all. JRAB On 2/4/15 8:04 PM, Julik Tarkhanov wrote: No just probably the same Corporate Suit who tried to force Area on flame users without there being any actual merit to doing so now works for the Foundry and is trying his thing there. On 03 Feb 2015, at 18:56, Nathan Dunsworth <nathandunswo...@gmail.com<mailto:nathandunswo...@gmail.com>> wrote: Look this is obv The Foundry not understanding the workflow of email and mailing lists and the differences with how forums work. -- Julik Tarkhanov | HecticElectric | Keizersgracht 736 1017 EX Amsterdam | The Netherlands | tel. +31 20 330 8250<tel:%2B31%C2%A020%20330%208250> cel. +31 61 145 06 36 | http://hecticelectric.nl<http://hecticelectric.nl/> _______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk<mailto:Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk>, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users _______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk<mailto:Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk>, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users _______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk<mailto:Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk>, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users _______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk<mailto:Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk>, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
