Ah thats a good one Howard, thanks!

Am 24.10.2015 um 13:52 schrieb Howard Jones:

> One other is you have tracked lots of trackers around one point - to reduce 
> noise, and then do the similar for 3 other areas.
> Then if you average the 4 groups you can then select them to create a corner 
> pin which only allows 4 trackers.
> 
> I used to have a tool to do just that but now its much easier.
> 
> H
>> On 24 Oct 2015, at 10:26, Daniel Hartlehnert <dah...@gmx.de> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Ian,
>> 
>> i am fully aware of the benefit of averaging several Trackers in order for 
>> them to hopefully cancel out each others noise. I just don't see why you 
>> would want to create a new averaged tracker. You already have the averaged 
>> transform data in the Tracker Node transform tab when all individual 
>> trackers contribute to it.
>> 
>> For baking out as Deke said, there is the export option (Yes, i used to use 
>> expressions as well, not necessary anymore though).
>> 
>> I do reckon though, it might be useful if you want to use it elsewhere as 
>> Howard mentioned. I just cannot imagine a scenario though.
>> 
>> Maybe i am just too dense here, but thanks for everybodies contribution!
>> 
>> Daniel
>> 
>> Am 23.10.2015 um 21:29 schrieb Ian Northrop:
>> 
>>> Here is my workflow (though this was more necessary before degraining 
>>> became so good):  If I had a really noise plate, and my tracker was jumping 
>>> around a lot, due to the grain, I would track the same feature a minimum of 
>>> 3 times with 3 different trackers (1 node).  because they are started on a 
>>> different pixel, but in the same feature-region, they would all get 
>>> affected differently by the plate's grain, but stay "on-track" to the 
>>> feature being tracked.  After this, you can select all 3, hit "average 
>>> trackers," and the resulting single tracker that Nuke will give you is 
>>> essentially a much better single tracker, with the effects of the grain 
>>> averaged out.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Friday, October 23, 2015 12:08 PM, Deke Kincaid <dekekinc...@gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> If you want to bake to a cornerpin or a transform?  It's a lot faster then 
>>> typing an expression?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to