Baking the trackers also has the benefit of avoiding the 'recalculating keyframes' dialog, which can occur when you leave the 'Tracker4' in the node stream.
On 25 October 2015 at 01:17, Daniel Hartlehnert <dah...@gmx.de> wrote: > Ah thats a good one Howard, thanks! > > Am 24.10.2015 um 13:52 schrieb Howard Jones: > > One other is you have tracked lots of trackers around one point - to > reduce noise, and then do the similar for 3 other areas. > Then if you average the 4 groups you can then select them to create a > corner pin which only allows 4 trackers. > > I used to have a tool to do just that but now its much easier. > > H > > On 24 Oct 2015, at 10:26, Daniel Hartlehnert <dah...@gmx.de> wrote: > > Hi Ian, > > i am fully aware of the benefit of averaging several Trackers in order for > them to hopefully cancel out each others noise. I just don't see why you > would want to create a new averaged tracker. You already have the averaged > transform data in the Tracker Node transform tab when all individual > trackers contribute to it. > > For baking out as Deke said, there is the export option (Yes, i used to > use expressions as well, not necessary anymore though). > > I do reckon though, it might be useful if you want to use it elsewhere as > Howard mentioned. I just cannot imagine a scenario though. > > Maybe i am just too dense here, but thanks for everybodies contribution! > > Daniel > > Am 23.10.2015 um 21:29 schrieb Ian Northrop: > > Here is my workflow (though this was more necessary before degraining > became so good): If I had a really noise plate, and my tracker was jumping > around a lot, due to the grain, I would track the same feature a minimum of > 3 times with 3 different trackers (1 node). because they are started on a > different pixel, but in the same feature-region, they would all get > affected differently by the plate's grain, but stay "on-track" to the > feature being tracked. After this, you can select all 3, hit "average > trackers," and the resulting single tracker that Nuke will give you is > essentially a much better single tracker, with the effects of the grain > averaged out. > > > > On Friday, October 23, 2015 12:08 PM, Deke Kincaid <dekekinc...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > If you want to bake to a cornerpin or a transform? It's a lot faster then > typing an expression? > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
