Just tried it adding the -n flag but it still slows down to a crawl. Is no
one else seeing this with medium to big scripts?

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Randy Little <randyslit...@gmail.com> wrote:

> All postage stamps turned off?
> On Mar 4, 2016 4:33 PM, "Jose Fernandez de Castro" <
> pixelcowbo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I know it's for troubleshooting, but when I'm in Performance mode I'm not
>> even able to do that as I can barely navigate the DAG, and even
>> connect/reconnect nodes without everything freezing for a few seconds. The
>> data output of course is useful, but it would be better to actually be able
>> to debug interactively.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 12:29 PM, John Mangia <j...@johnmangia.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I believe that mode is intended more for troubleshooting of slow scripts
>>> rather than daily use. If you didn't use performance metrics you could
>>> probably figure out where things are slowing down by looking at the usual
>>> culprits (large bbox, scanline render, vectorblur, furnace, convolve, etc)
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Mar 4, 2016, at 3:19 PM, Deke Kincaid <dekekinc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> You could just render a frame in the shell and spit out an XML with the
>>> performance metrics using the "--Pf filename" flag.  Then you just have
>>> data to create metrics from rather then having to look through the
>>> nodegraph manually.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Jose Fernandez de Castro <
>>> pixelcowbo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Has anyone noticed that enabling Performance metrics makes Nuke really
>>>> slow? When I enable it on a medium to heavy script, the information on
>>>> performance mode is mostly useless, as I can barely navigate the DAG as
>>>> everything freezes and updates too slowly. This didn't use the case with
>>>> the early implementations of Performance mode, so I think something might
>>>> be causing the GUI to slow down heavily. I rarely use performance mode this
>>>> days because of this issue. Anyone else seeing this?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jose Fernandez de Castro
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jose Fernandez de Castro
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>



-- 
Jose Fernandez de Castro
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to