Linear dpx? Thats sounds nuts. Do they mean 709 instead of log?
On May 21, 2016 18:25, "Andrew Mumford" <a_mumf...@mac.com> wrote:

> So frustrated by the “seeming” inability of major “Color” labs,
> Technicolor, Deluxe etc, etc - to consistently convert
> Sony F65/F55 originated material to a consistent “correct” DPX file to
> their 3rd party vendors.
>
> Many houses insist on embedding metadata that set’s "dpx/transfer”
> metadata flag to sRGB or rec709 which as far as I know is completely wrong
> and looks wrong ?
>
> The other day we had to request GB’s of data to be repulled since the
> “major name” color house insisted that they normally txfer too dpx as
> “linear” and still flagged it as sRGB in metadata.
>
> Am I just catching up to this ?
>
> Is this a new problem in the past few years or is this my “Duh - where
> have you been moment” ?
>
> How are other people handling this ?
>
> Any input appreciated.
>
> Thx
>
> ---
> Andrew Mumford
>
> a_mumf...@mac.com
> 1 (310) 619 0208
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to