Linear dpx? Thats sounds nuts. Do they mean 709 instead of log? On May 21, 2016 18:25, "Andrew Mumford" <a_mumf...@mac.com> wrote:
> So frustrated by the “seeming” inability of major “Color” labs, > Technicolor, Deluxe etc, etc - to consistently convert > Sony F65/F55 originated material to a consistent “correct” DPX file to > their 3rd party vendors. > > Many houses insist on embedding metadata that set’s "dpx/transfer” > metadata flag to sRGB or rec709 which as far as I know is completely wrong > and looks wrong ? > > The other day we had to request GB’s of data to be repulled since the > “major name” color house insisted that they normally txfer too dpx as > “linear” and still flagged it as sRGB in metadata. > > Am I just catching up to this ? > > Is this a new problem in the past few years or is this my “Duh - where > have you been moment” ? > > How are other people handling this ? > > Any input appreciated. > > Thx > > --- > Andrew Mumford > > a_mumf...@mac.com > 1 (310) 619 0208 > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users