Tim Hochberg wrote: > I'm actually surprised that the take version is faster than my original > version since it makes a big ol' copy. I guess this is an indication > that indexing is more expensive than I realize. That's why nothing beats > measuring!
Actually, your original version is just as fast as the take() version. Both are about 9X faster than numpy.mean() on my system. I prefer the take() version because you only have to pass a single argument to mean_accum() Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
