Martin Spacek wrote: > > Actually, your original version is just as fast as the take() version. > Both are about 9X faster than numpy.mean() on my system. I prefer the > take() version because you only have to pass a single argument to > mean_accum()
I forgot to mention that all my indices are, for now, sorted. I just tried shuffling them (as you did), but I still get the same 9x improvement in speed, so I don't know why you only get a 4x improvement on your system. Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
